Jump to content

User talk:J 1972

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Omega Phi Delta)
This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because it has been identified as an account used for promotion of a company or group, with a username that implies that this has been done by that company or group. See Wikipedia:FAQ/Organization and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest.

This kind of activity is considered spamming and is forbidden by Wikipedia policies. In addition, the use of a username like yours violates our username policy.

You may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below or emailing the administrator who blocked you.

Your reason should include your response to this issue and a new username you wish to adopt that does not violate our username policy (specifically, understand that accounts are for individuals, not companies or groups, and that your username should reflect this). Usernames that have already been taken are listed here.

Cirt (talk) 04:22, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked[edit]

I have unblocked you, so that you can go through the username change process. Please follow the instructions at WP:CHU. Thank you, Cirt (talk) 21:58, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to compliment you on the design of the Omega Phi Delta page. While there are still some ways in which it could be improved, and there are some things in the page that may not be appropriate, I definitely approve of the way in which you created it. Compared to some of the created pages for some of the other Philippines Fraternities, it is a dream. I think a complete chapter list might be an appropriate addition. The size of Omega Phi Delta may ultimately lead to a RFD on notability, but I don't think anyone can fault the degree to which the page uses proper design.Naraht (talk) 12:53, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File copyright problem with File:1st_National_Convention.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:1st_National_Convention.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Rettetast (talk) 21:05, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File copyright problem with File:1st National Convention.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:1st National Convention.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Closedmouth (talk) 09:09, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Omega Phi Delta for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Omega Phi Delta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omega Phi Delta until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Moray An Par (talk) 09:12, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]