User talk:Ordenrecords

Welcome!

Hello Ordenrecords! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 07:53, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

December 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Pink Turns Blue has been reverted.
Your edit here to Pink Turns Blue was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/Pink.Turns.Blue.Official/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 07:53, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pink Turns Blue

Hi Orden Records, you have any evidence that you could use to support the adding of The Aerdt Club EP to their discography? I don't see it listed at Discogs and I can't find any references to it in a Google search either? If you have the record, maybe you could add it to Discogs and include some photos of it? Robman94 (talk) 17:31, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Aerdt - Untold Stories (Club EP) was a 3 track EP exclusively for club and radio DJs. The only written / documented reference I can offer is the German Alternative Charts position it reached (only have it as PDF). I added it to discogs. (and I realize that I have to edit quite a few things there too) - the band has become active again and has signed to an US-label). Ordenrecords (talk) 21:00, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of German alternative charts

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on German alternative charts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lard Almighty (talk) 14:22, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 14:44, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user has engaged in block evasion as {{

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ordenrecords (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

MagisterLudi1963 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Hello, sorry for me being stupid. I understand now that I should have asked for unblocking AND a new username HERE instead of creating a new "non-brand" account. (it even says so in the explanation!) I also understand that I need to be very careful when correcting or adding anything because it could easily be promotion or of commercial interest to a company. I just hope that when you see WHAT I tried to amend or change you can see that I did not intend to promote anything nor did I intend to do anybody any harm. Just wanted to correct things or add new facts. Since I created the account MagisterLudi1963 I am not sure whether I shall delete it now and you rename ordenrecords?

Decline reason:

Decline per discussion below. You may not edit directly about your record company. Please discuss unblocking at user talk:MagisterLudi1963 Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:09, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We already have that user name

@Bbb23: Perhaps the blocked sock is a rename attempt? Or is there even more afoot? Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:37, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Dlohcierekim: Looks like it is what exactly the user says it is. The question is whether they should be allowed to edit under the new name. The original block was a hard block, so they were not entitled to create a new account. The two accounts have unblock requests floating at both Talk pages (in abundance). I wouldn't feel comfortable allowing this person to edit Wikipedia unless they stayed completely away from anything having to do with their record company. If that's all they want to do going forward, then I'd leave them blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:06, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'll decline both, and ask user to stick to the other username. Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:05, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]