User talk:Out90

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Out90, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Antonio have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

Roman Catholic additions and atheist removal[edit]

Hi

I notice that some of your edits seem to be placing Roman Catholic in several articles as well as removing Atheist and substituting other religions.

FOr example yo have removed "officially Atheist" from the North Vietnam article and added "Roman Cathoilic to "Fidel Castro"

To do such a change would require that you provide sources for these changes. If you do not know what htese are please go to these links

WP:References

WP:POV

If you have any question you can ask on my chat /talk page

thanks Chaosdruid (talk) 21:56, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Roman Catholic POV edits[edit]

Hi

I decided to look at some of your other contributions to Wikipedia and find that there is a large amount of POV pushing for the ROman Catholic church

It is not acceptable behaviour on Wikipedia I am afraid. PLease try to only edit when you have sources which verify your claims and when reverted by another editor is is not acceptable to WP:Editwar— changing back to match your point of view.

It is also in extremely bad taste to try and change history as you did with the edit saying that Cuba was not atheist. The section talks about a time when Cuba WAS atheist. I understand that things have changed, but you must make the relevent changes in the correct chronological timeframe by adding the new information when it came about. If it is true that Cuba was made a secular country in 1880's that is where the information should be.

Chaosdruid (talk) 22:22, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Knights Templar appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Please refrain from continually inserting "Roman Catholic" over the top of Greek Orthodox and other orthodox Catholic churches Chaosdruid (talk) 22:36, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adding wrong numbers[edit]

You've introduced wrong numbers here and, more obviously, here, where you claim that there are 1 billion catholics in Cuba. Please don't do so; if you change information given in articles, please provide a source. Huon (talk) 23:19, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Roman Catholic Diocese of Gallup. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. PLease desist from changing population figures to show millions of Roman Catholics in diocese Chaosdruid (talk) 08:31, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Santa Fe, you may be blocked from editing. I will have to report this matter if you persist in these alterations Chaosdruid (talk) 08:33, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alteration to populations[edit]

HI

Can you stop these edits now please. You are undermining WIkipedia and misrepresenting the Roman Catholic Faith.

These two edits in particular [1] and [2] are not sourced and one appears to be even more than the complete population of the area, let alone the Roman Catholic population

Please limit yourself to more constructive edits

THanks Chaosdruid (talk) 08:36, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

--Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 12:06, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever your personal beliefs may be, wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a medium for the promotion of any particular faith. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 12:06, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010[edit]

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to California. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. You seem to have a WP:BIAS towards pushing "Roman Catholic" edits. Suggest you stop now! --moreno oso (talk) 02:04, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have just reverted several fake statistics you introduced: Debrecen, Roman Catholic Diocese of San Bernardino and Demographics of Sri Lanka. In all three cases a source was given in the article, but you ignored it and instead just made up some numbers. That is considered vandalism, and it got you blocked once already. If you persist, you will be blocked again. Huon (talk) 03:35, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Religion in Cuba, you may be blocked from editing. Faking numbers simply is not acceptable. Huon (talk) 16:32, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]