User talk:PFAStudent

Thanks for your additions to the Kent State University articles. In regards to the Premier Flight Academy, the sources indicate that the Academy is an independent institution now affilliated with KSU, not a program established by or exclusively run by KSU. --JonRidinger (talk) 02:47, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The sources provided from KSU specifically state that PMA is a private industry, not a public school. Further, they have a small affilliation with KSU just for a non-degree certification program. In other words, students majoring in Aeronautics at KSU probably wouldn't do much of anything with PMA and PMA is not overseen by or under the direction of KSU except for the certification program, and even then it's a loose oversight and all the teachers are PMA instructors, not KSU. It's much more a partnership than a full-blown affiliation. The source describes it as a "noncredit workshop" that is "offered" by KSU through the Office of Continuing Studies. “To the best of our knowledge, this type of entrepreneurial partnership between a public university and private industry for flight training is unique,” says Jeff Kressin, president of Premier Flight Academy. “We’re thrilled to partner with Kent State in this opportunity to meet a growing need for safe and successful flight training for international pilots.” (emphasis added). The University infobox is for actual colleges or universities, not private business that has a partnership with one. As for the KSU template, it really should link to the Aeronautics program rather than PMA; there are many companies and organizations that have partnerships with KSU. --JonRidinger (talk) 04:53, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:The Seven Words from the Cross in a Church Bulletin for a Good Friday Tenebrae Service (Faith Lutheran Church).jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Seven Words from the Cross in a Church Bulletin for a Good Friday Tenebrae Service (Faith Lutheran Church).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:08, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree files

Some of the files that you have uploaded may be unfree. See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 February 26#OTRS pending since November. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:32, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Advent Calendar.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Advent Calendar.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:16, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wooden Lectern (United Methodist Church of the Saviour).jpg

Unfortunately, the Shield of the Trinity diagram is quite blurry in this photo. It should also have been uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, not English Wikipedia (en.wikipedia is interested in few uploads other than "fair use" images, and images narrowly about the internal processes and procedures of en.wikipedia itself, at this point). AnonMoos (talk) 18:10, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, PFAStudent. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Premier Flight Academy

The article Premier Flight Academy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Routine coverage, it's a non-notable flight school, fails WP:GNG/WP:ORG. Ineligible for looser criteria of WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES as it is not accredited and degree-awarding.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ☆ Bri (talk) 15:52, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, PFAStudent. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Advent Wreath in Christmastide (Broadway United Methodist Church).jpg

The file File:Advent Wreath in Christmastide (Broadway United Methodist Church).jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image, no encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Lectern (United Methodist Church of the Saviour).jpg

The file File:Lectern (United Methodist Church of the Saviour).jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused low quality image. Unclear copyright status, as there is no freedom of panorama for 3D artworks in the United States.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 08:03, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]