User talk:Pairfum London

Welcome!

Hello, Pairfum London, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Pairfum London, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! — Prodraxis {talk • contribs} (she/her) 14:09, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Pairfum London

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Pairfum London, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Prodraxis {talk • contribs} (she/her) 14:09, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because your account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
Provide a new username.

To do this, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. ✗plicit 14:13, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Pairfum London (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Biu55 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

We wish to contribute to the various subjects around 'perfume' and 'fragrance' on wikipedia. I have expertise in this field and believe that factually editing topics in the field is not a conflict of interest with being employed by a Perfumery House. Quite the opposite, it uniquely qualifies to write about the subject. Pairfum London (talk) 10:06, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"Perfumer" is not available as a username, please propose something else. Your account must also be exclusively used by a single person who may not give others access. Wikipedia does not have "pages for" topics, but articles about topics, which are typically written by independent editors wholly unconnected with the subject. Please read conflict of interest and paid editing. You won't be unblocked to, in the short term, edit about your company or topics for which you have a conflict of interest. If that is your only goal here, this is the end of the road. If you are interested in being a general contributor and editing about topics for which you have no conflict of interest, please tell what those might be. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 10:35, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You need to make a new unblock request below for someone else to review. 331dot (talk) 12:12, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Pairfum London (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Biu55 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

We wish to contribute to the various subjects around 'perfume' and 'fragrance' on wikipedia. I have expertise in this field and believe that factually editing topics in the field is not a conflict of interest with being employed by a Perfumery House. Quite the opposite, it uniquely qualifies to write about the subject.

Decline reason:

YOu keep using "we". We prefer very much that all Aaccounts be under the control of a single person. We need clarity on this before even considering an unblock. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:04, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pairfum London (talk) 16:22, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever contributions you make to Wikipedia articles must be supported by citations to sources that Wikipedia considers reliable. Your own unpublished personal knowledge or experience (referred to here as original research) is not accepted. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 06:45, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Pairfum London (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Biu55 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I wish to contribute to the various subjects around 'perfume' and 'fragrance' on wikipedia. I have expertise in this field and believe that factually editing topics in the field is not a conflict of interest with being employed by a Perfumery House. Quite the opposite, it uniquely qualifies me to write about the subject. I understand the concept of objectivity and will only cite published sources. Pairfum London (talk) 09:31, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please see WP:EXPERT; typically, articles are written by lay people summarizing what independent reliable sources say about a topic. People with knowledge in a field are welcome, but must edit in accordance with policies. You seem to misunderstand conflict of interest- you clearly have one. Usually in this situation, we want to see a history of edits in other areas so that the user can demonstrate that they understand relevant policies before permitting them to indirectly contribute in the area of their COI. However, if you can convince us that you understand these policies without editing in other areas, you may do so in a new request. I am closing this request, but this is a very soft close and you are welcome to make a new request. 331dot (talk) 08:55, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]