User talk:Paul Polimero

Welcome![edit]

Hi Paul Polimero! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Victor Lopes ^Fala!•C 03:47, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Eugenia Cooney has been reverted.
Your edit here to Eugenia Cooney was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.reddit.com/r/EUGENIACOONEY/comments/gke3wm/didnt_she_claim_to_be_56_before/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:13, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Jackie Hollywood[edit]

Hola de nuevo. Busqué fuentes sobre ella y no encontré muchas fuentes independientes para poder crear un artículo. Encontré esta pero el tema principal no es Jackie, es Jenni; aquí hablan de ella, pero parece ser un blog de Wordpress; si esta Jackie es la misma Jackie contaría como una fuente confiable e independiente; también; también. Te dejo este enlace (Help:Your first article) que te puede brindar ayuda adicional respecto a las políticas y lineamientos al escribir un artículo en Wikipedia en inglés. Cabe recalcar que siendo estrictos nosotros generalmente no utilizamos fuentes como YouTube o Instagram para citar información, independientemente de lo que el video o imagen muestre. Por último, debido a los líneamientos de las páginas de discusión (WP:ENGLISHPLEASE), las converaciones en este sitio deberían de ir en inglés. Cuando eras un usuario anónimo me permitía hablarte en español para poderte brindar asistencia sobre tus dudas. Pero ya que ahora eres un usario establecido, se requiere que exista comunicación en inglés. Si no deseas comunicarte en inglés, me puedes dejar mensajes en es:Usuario discusión:Tbhotch. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 18:15, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jackie (or whoever tooks the picture) must explicity say "This photograph is in the public domain" or Creative Commons: CC-SA or CC-SA-BY. These are the only acceptable licenses for Wikipedia. Alternatively, the owner can contact the WP:OTRS team. For the article, unfortunately at the moment Jackie does not satisfies WP:NSINGER. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 01:48, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jackie Hollywood for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jackie Hollywood is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackie Hollywood until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hitro talk 06:53, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shakey Sue for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shakey Sue is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shakey Sue until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

I appreciate that you're a new editor, and it can be disappointing to have an article nominated for deletion: there's a useful guide which you may find helpful at Help:My article got nominated for deletion! Regards, ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 12:28, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Conchita Campbell[edit]

It has a citation needed tag that was added back in May 2009. At this point, I think it unbased and probably it should be removed until Campbell confirms it. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 18:17, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if she said it or not, but there is no written evidence available. Perhaps a video/radio interview or something like that. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 19:03, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Hailee Steinfeld[edit]

I have requested semi-protection. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 17:36, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I gave them two final warnings, because nobody warned them about this. If they resume the editing, the IP can be reported. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 19:45, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As she has proved that she is not a reliable source for her own height, WP:SECONDARY sources are preferred. True or false, she is reported to be 5'8 ft tall. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 20:34, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jackie Hollywood[edit]

Hello, Paul Polimero. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jackie Hollywood".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Ə XPLICIT 12:49, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021[edit]

Your recent editing history at Hailee Steinfeld shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Please get consensus on the talk page before entering height. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 22:33, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jackie Hollywood[edit]

Hello, Paul Polimero. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jackie Hollywood".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:02, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit wars[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tom Holland. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. – ².O.^Boxing 12:00, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at your contributions, you've been engaged in slow-moving edit wars with multiple editors over multiple articles for years. If you revert any of those heights back in you will be reported. The height of an actor or some author is not at all relevant or notable. Stop. – ².O.^Boxing 12:20, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. – ².O.^Boxing 12:16, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Courcelles (talk) 12:26, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]