User talk:Peak2015

From few years editing Wikipedia with ips - joy with name

Welcome!

Hello, Peak2015, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 08:23, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Canvassing

Hi Peak2015. I noticed that you copied an extensive message to several user-talkpages. Apart from it being a very ling message, which is dfficult to read, is also seems to be WP:CANVAS, which is problematic. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 08:24, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Peak2015, As per Wikipedia:Canvassing, you can ask for users to comment, but not to support any particular opinion. I hope you take it positively.--Vin09 (talk) 08:26, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vin09 Clearly mentioned asking their neutral comment as per Dharma Peak2015 (talk) 08:30, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fine.--Vin09 (talk) 08:35, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Obvious disruption related to https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=691652709#Proposed_site_ban_for_representatives_of_OMICS_Publishing_Group. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 09:00, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock Spaceman

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Peak2015 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am just notifying the truth, Sorry I am not aware is it wrong? Please unblock i will not repeat again. Peak2015 (talk) 09:20, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed as another sock SmartSE (talk) 15:40, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If this editor is unblocked, he/she will almost certainly be relocked as a sock of Scholarscentral (talk · contribs), see sockpuppet archive. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 14:19, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Scholarscentral, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

SmartSE (talk) 14:36, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]