Jump to content

User talk:Peterb21

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AntiCompositeNumber was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:43, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Peterb21! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:43, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

Hi Peterb21! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 22:50, Friday, July 12, 2019 (UTC)

Advice on your draft[edit]

Hi - a few points to think about.

  • It's not clear to me whether the subject of the article is a particular school, or a type of schooling. I think it's a particular school, but the first sentence says it's a type of school - a bit confusing.
  • The sources don't appear to mention the subject of the article - this is a problem. We are pretty lax when it comes to notability in schools, per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, but the need for verifiability still applies so we have to have some sort of sourcing to demonstrate that the school exists. (This might be covered in the LA Times article - I cant' read that since I'm in Europe, so this might be less of a concern).
  • You've got some external links, rather than citations, in the body of the text - these need to go. Wikilinks to other Wikipedia articles, but external links should onlt be found in a clearly labelled 'external links' section.
  • Do you have a connection to the school? You should probably read our WP:COI and WP:PAID guidelines if you are, and take the appropriate action.
:Question re: connection to the school. I am on staff (a teacher, not principal) at the school, but we have no official website. It is a public school and no one would benefit in any way financially from any Wikipedia article about it. Does that qualify as COI? I did read the link you sent me, but I'm still not sure. And thank you again!Peterb21 (talk) 15:18, 15 July 2019 (UTC) @user:Girth Summit[reply]

Hope that's helpful - you can submit the draft to AfC and other editors will either publish it, or give you more feedback. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 09:04, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, forgot - the picture shows a butterfly, rather than a school! I assume you just inserted that as a test image, until you can get a picture for the school itself - I'd suggest replacing that before submitting it (or simply removing it altogether if you don't have access to a copyright-free picture of the school) - it is preferred, but not necessary for an article to have an image. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 10:04, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Dan arndt was: undefined
Dan arndt (talk) 04:41, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
:[[user:Dan arndt] I am literally brand new to Wikipedia, I thought my article was neutral and well-referenced. All I see is rejected for undefined reason. Sorta hard to learn from that criticism. Could you elaborate just a tiny bit? Also, I thought articles were returned with suggestions before outright rejection- there was no copyright infringement.
: @User:Dan arndt, I didn’t see your comments elsewhere until just now. I see that you gave reasoning. Still confused, but like I said I’m new...

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Palos Verdes (Bluff) Cove, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Peterb21. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "William J. Johnston Community Day School".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 17:24, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Peterb21. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Palos Verdes (Bluff) Cove".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 21:23, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]