User talk:Petrus4

Steve Hassan

Hi Petrus, I left a note for you about it on Talk:Steve Hassan. Cheers, SlimVirgin ^(talk) 08:21, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)

Richard Stallman

You recently added two comments to the Talk:Richard Stallman page. They are in response to archived discussion that refers to material that has now changed on the article. You previous post to the page was to more recently posted material.

It may be more effective to start a new section responding to the existing material on the page rather than clutter the discussion page with off-topic material. -- 21:05, 21 January 2006 User:216.114.169.1

I noticed you deleted my link to ESR's article. I'm curious...if I hadn't included the comment about wondering when it'd be reverted, would you have left it there?

I suppose there's more than one ingredient in the recipe for flamebait. Cheers, --Ashawley 00:23, 22 January 2006 (UTC) [aka User:216.114.169.1][reply]

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed undone by an automated bot. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. If you feel you have received this notice in error, please contact the bot owner // Tawkerbot2 14:14, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tawkerbot2 and the reversion of your edit(s)

Hello, Petrus4. You may have noticed User:Tawkerbot2 reverted one or more of your edits and perhaps left a message on your talk page. Wikipedia recently experienced a database malfunction, causing Tawkerbot2 to misidentify legitimate edits; hence the reversion of your edit(s) and the message. The bot has been temporarily disabled until the problems are rectified. Thanks. —Wayward ^Talk 18:51, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lets Talk Bogan

Hey, Just left you a note on Talk:Bogan--DennyCrane Talk 05:57, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bogan

If you are still unhappy with the content in contention being removed, can you please discuss what to do with it on the talk page? If it is original research, as I and Asa01 assert it to be, we are justified in removing it. Wikipedia policy stipulates that statements subject to dispute must have sources and speculation and original research should not be added. Thank you. 02:16, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Batman Begins as Hard SF

For me, Batman Begins is Hard SF. See my comment on the Talk page: Talk:Hard_science_fiction#Batman_Begins.3F. Davichito (talk) 16:23, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: The tragedy that has befallen Wikipedia

I'm not sure why you're leaving these messages on my talk page but I thought I'd let you know that I can't do anything to help you, and probably won't be reading them. - Rjd0060 (talk) 15:28, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]