User talk:Plandu/Archives/2022 1
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Plandu. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
STOP UNDOING MY EDITS!!
Please, let me add content !! 2800:E2:407F:FEA2:8D02:8E18:AD2:66E1 (talk) 18:15, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- You're welcome to add content that isn't mindless vandalism. Plandu (talk) 18:18, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
WP:AFC Helper News
Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.
- AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
- The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.
Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
What's going on with you
why don't you revert me? 79.191.195.104 (talk) 15:31, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Ladapo reverting.
Check the source friend and the ANI https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Joseph_Lapado_vandalism
on the article.2600:1700:7610:41E0:7CB0:D9D1:83BE:D383 (talk) 16:40, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Why did you revert my edit? 17,000 doctors not enough ? My edit which you removed was:
Alternatively, " Dr. Robert Malone, who has risen to prominence for contradicting the scientific consensus on COVID-19, claimed that "the consensus of over 17,000 physicians and medical scientists are that the risk-benefit ratio for children does not justify vaccination. ”Malone appeared to be referring to a declaration signed by medical professionals as part of the "Global COVID Summit" initiative". the source says exactly this (copy and pasted makes this easy)
The announcement came after multiple health experts picked by DeSantis to participate in the roundtable downplayed the importance of the vaccine for children, with some saying the benefits of vaccination do not outweigh the risks.
Dr. Robert Malone, who has risen to prominence for contradicting the scientific consensus on COVID-19, claimed that "the consensus of over 17,000 physicians and medical scientists are that the risk-benefit ratio for children does not justify vaccination.”
Malone appeared to be referring to a declaration signed by medical professionals as part of the "Global COVID Summit" initiative.
Do you care to address my concern? Have a blessed day.2600:1700:7610:41E0:7CB0:D9D1:83BE:D383 (talk) 19:13, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
- The statement was neither cited, nor was it formatted in a way that would even show up on the page. Instead, it was appended to an article title that was part of a reference. So it was both formatted incorrectly and did not have a citation attached to it. Those are the reasons. Plandu (talk) 19:23, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
No doubt you believe that lie comrade. Seems your edit summary says nothing along the lines you state here. The edit was done within the previous citation and I assure you would always appear within the article, as I make sure that it does. God bless you always.2600:1700:7610:41E0:C53D:FD71:33E4:A7DE (talk) 14:18, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yuanyuan Zhou, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Douglas Clark.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Stop it
People need to know that they shouldn't be too friendly to someone they don't want to be friends with — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:7080:A400:CB2B:44B4:7C1F:6022:6481 (talk) 21:41, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
Five years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:08, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ian Tyson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bravo.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bilyana Raeva, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Varna.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eloise Page, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richmond.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)