Jump to content

User talk:Platinum Roses

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Platinum Roses, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains(talk) 01:23, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Today's articles for improvement

Would you like to lend a helping hand, or just get more involved? The Today's articles for improvement (TAFI) project is a great way to contribute. This project identifies and collaborates upon underdeveloped articles that require improvement.

There are no requirements for membership (other than the fact that you must be extra nice to newcomers) and it is wikifun!

To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chess was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Grognard Extraordinaire Chess (talk) Ping when replying 05:42, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Just wanted to let you know that I screwed up this rejection message above. The proper message should've been that the article already exists on Wikipedia, not that it "does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own. In addition the first version of the comment I left here and on the article was that the "submitter was a sockpuppet of someone else", e.g. an alternate account. I meant to type "author was a sockpuppet of someone else", as the original author of the article was abusively using multiple accounts and I've changed my comment to reflect that. I did not mean to accuse you of sockpuppetry or abusively using multiple accounts and I apologize for writing that you did. You're doing a very fine job of updating and contributing to Wikipedia. I hope you continue to edit and help the project in the future like you are now. Grognard Extraordinaire Chess (talk) Ping when replying 05:54, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]