User talk:Ploppper120

March 2023

Hello, I'm Violetwtf. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to NASA spinoff technologies—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. violetwtf (talk) 17:57, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Scrotum. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Squeakachu (talk) 18:05, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bill Sackter, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Bill Sackter was changed by Ploppper120 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.884613 on 2023-03-16T18:08:18+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:08, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.