User talk:Popabun888

April 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Joint-stock company has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Joint-stock company was changed by Popabun888 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950623 on 2013-04-22T14:08:30+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:09, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Authorized King James Version with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Faizan -Let's talk! 14:10, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Sly (opera) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Faizan -Let's talk! 14:11, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jaggi Vasudev with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Faizan -Let's talk! 14:11, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at KDRO, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Vigyani (talk) 14:31, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 14:42, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]