User talk:Prashanttandon

July 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:28, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Prashanttandon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There was no intention to advertise, i just added the links to add authenticity of my article. However if this is anyhow against guidelines, i would not repeat this Cvtech (talk) 12:33, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

{You seem to believe the links were the only problem. Not true. The entire article was blatantly promotional, completely inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not a business directory; see WP:NOT. Yamla (talk) 13:04, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Prashanttandon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please give me 1 more chance, i assure you, i will publish only after going through each and every guideline, even you can see i clearly disclosed my relation with company, but my mistake was that i did not read all rules and policies. this is my humble and last request, if you again find me violating it in any way, i would not ask for unblock again, Cvtech (talk) 13:37, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You disclosed a COI, but you failed to make the Terms of Use-required paid editing disclosure as you are an employee of the company. You won't be unblocked to edit about your company, so we will need to know what edits you will make instead for which you have no conflict of interest(that includes not just your company, but its field). Such a limitation would not necessarily be permanent, but we will need to see a good edit history from you that shows you understand relevant policies(you don't need to know every policy, there are more than you probably think, I don't even know them all) before permitting that. 331dot (talk) 08:37, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Cvtech", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually (not your role), such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. Alternatively, you can just create a new account and use that for editing. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 17:56, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jimfbleak: This user's username has been changed from "Cvtech" to "Prashanttandon" via a global request. If this was the only reason for the block, their username now complies with the username policy and the account can be unblocked. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 18:57, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nihonjoe:, if you look at my block and the response by @Yamla:, it's clear that the name was not the reason for the hard block. The article was fact-free blatant spam, and the editor has given no indication that they will not just try again if they are unblocked Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:27, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jimfbleak: If you read my message, it clearly states "if this was the only reason for the block". If it's not (which seems to be the case here), then don't unblock them. My message was merely a courtesy notification after the rename. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 17:38, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Prashanttandon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

With due respect, whatever has been done was unintentional, by paid editing disclosure, i thought, its for something i am being paid for, apart from salary/etc. I could have created a new account, if my intention was wrong, but please understand i am requesting you because, i want to be aligned with your policies, I assure you i would not write anything about the company i work for. Please take my words. Primarily i would contribute only to the industry in which i work(without mentioning my company name), mainly for Telecom, SMS, Block chain, AI, etc. Here is my linkedin profile as well https://www.linkedin.com/in/prashanttandon007/. Prashanttandon (talk) 09:12, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There's something very fishy going on here with you and User:Swatibhasin, Besides being on the same IP address, you created an article about a company owned by Vishvamitra Tandon, and Swatibhasin created an article about Vishwamitra Tandon. These names are different by one letter. I think you'd need to explain what's going on here. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:09, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You've demonstrated yourself incapable of writing appropriately in subject areas for which you have a conflict of interest. --Yamla (talk) 11:32, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And saying that you could evade your block and create another account is not a point in your favor. 331dot (talk) 19:04, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And no, paid editing is not limited to specific payment for edits, it is any compensated relationship, including employment. 331dot (talk) 19:06, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]