User talk:Prassingh

Welcome[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. This account was created for you. We hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions or place {{helpme|your question here}} on this page, and someone will be around to help. Again, welcome! --AccReqBot 13:10, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Hello Prassingh and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Help pages
Tutorial
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing?

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! VViking_TalkEdits 14:34, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am surprised by the reverts. None of my edits were even close to vandalism or unacceptable. I am new to Wiki as a contributor, but know enough to realise that my edits simplified and corrected the original information.. Prassingh (talk) 15:30, 17 October 2023 (UTC)Prassingh[reply]

I'm not surprised. "Simplified and corrected the original information" is not an accurate description of what you did. The only "correction" would be in your first edit [1], where you mentioned it was now part of the Coca-Cola company, which is already in the article with sources, and CEO Philippe Schaillee, whose name is not mentioned in the management team source you provided. But that's not the bulk of what that edit did; it also removed a chunk of sourced content without an explanation. And your next two edits [2], [3], did only that: removed large chunks of sourced content without an accuracte explanation. I see that all removed content pertained to controversies involving the company. In fact the removal was so thorough that it left a completely empty "Controversies" section. So it seems your "simplified" would be what most would more accurately describe as "whitewashed". It's not what I would call vandalism, but it is definitely unacceptable. _signed,Willondon (talk) 16:21, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]