User talk:Prilin385

October 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Chess variant has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 15:04, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page User:Alansohn. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 15:06, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User:Alansohn. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Atif.t2 (talk) 20:12, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Zoominto971514.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Zoominto971514.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:12, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/CubicShogi.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Athleek123 23:15, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to CubicShogi, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 07:21, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Cubic chess has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see here for what to do. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 07:19, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cubic chess[edit]

If you want to have the page deleted, you need to propose it for deletion or nominate it for deletion (preferred option). Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 07:23, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Prilin, add this reference to your CubicShogi proposal:

Pritchard, D. B. (2007). The Classified Encyclopedia of Chess Variants. John Beasley. p. 260. ISBN 978-0-9555168-0-1.

Then we can work on your article to get it in the best shape. Ihardlythinkso (talk) 10:49, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Block[edit]

You called me "illiterate" and a "mad editor" but to block you for doing so might be considered abusing my admin rights to protect myself. However when I see you say "wikipedia editors are mentally backward", I have no hesitation in blocking you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:53, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ralph,

The utterance: I was created CubicShogi with en effort to simplyfy the original shogi for the candidates on west for this splendid game. (I was many times sending the letters - David had not liked internet, if I had sent him one package of Cubic chess, he was enjoied. He had an admirable man, which was writting his ECV with his wife than 85-year-old.

Here are answers on your questions: Q1) when a pawn or knight crosses into promotion zone, promotion is automatic. Q2) a fact that captured opponent´s pawn is staged for him, is not software capture, but a handicap in my mechanism of changing a color and a value of the cubes, The pawns are necessary to store captured units, therfore on beginning of the game are 4 pawns in the reservoir. David was liked a Hostage chess, in which must be two hostages of the same value to change a color - it like me not, before if I capture opponent´s bishop and he captures a knight, I can us knight - not bishop.Use of one chess set is prized high. Q3) "extra" pawns could never find any application - are you sure? Without they all captured cubes are eliminated from a game. it was my intention combine two types of capture (shopgi and chess). Q4) player may not drop a piece from his stack - pawn, knight and bishop, therefore unit in the zone must not promote as original shogi. Q5 )check to it's king, but, the software ignored the check. Yes, that is big vailure of the software. Is today improved and changed on my web. Q6) In original shogi units dropped to promotion zone must first move to be promoted (after option - this "meditative" feature has not liked me, whe I was studiing shogi variants. These are all the answers.OK.

PS.I am sorry, but any mad editor demonstrates hi "power" in the megalomania.

Best regards, Vladimir

Slovak draughts[edit]

Hi Prilin, I saw your add to the draughts table, the description of Slovak draughts will be unclear to English readers, can you explain more to me what it means, here is what you wrote:

For pieces have an extension two squares forward, a first skip from they starts a capturing, which is as far as this moment for the pieces blocked. Winner is a player, whose opponent has only one or two pieces.

I found this at Czech draughts#Regional differences, is it the same game as your description above, or different? (And if different, is one right and the other wrong? Or two variations? Or?):

Although Czech draughts is itself a regional variant of the draughts game, the version played in the Slovak Republic is slightly different in that each player begins with only two ranks of men, and that the huffing rule is enforced: if a piece that must capture does not do so, the opponent may, at his option, take it before his own move. Furthermore, if a player has no legal moves, but does have men on the board, the game is a draw.

Ok, Ihardlythinkso (talk) 02:40, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ralph. if the description of Slovak draughts will be unclear to English readers, I will remove it. My friend Martin Holeček is ending my variant Slovak checkers with two inovative feature: new unit king can move forward one or two squares. A capturing is not allowed until first skip of any king and then is mandatory. P.S. I am unfortunately slovak, a tutorial is available on YouTube.

Best regards Prilin

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/CubicShogi concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/CubicShogi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 13:35, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, HausteorBot,

I am sorry, but Cubicshogi is in the development - I am an inventor. I was starting a manufacturing it last dayes with best form with the improvements that I has written in Wikipedia. I must write to may chess friend and editor Ralph Peters about your effort of deletion and I hope that your effort will be not successful

Best regard

Vladimir Pribylinec

Prilin, HasteurBot is a robot (software Bot) so you cannot talk to it. Article Cubic Shogi already exists. The Bot thinks Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/CubicShogi is a different game from Cubic Shogi because the name is slighly different ("CubicShogi" compared to "Cubic Shogi"). It looks like you don't need the development file (Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/CubicShogi) anymore, so just do nothing and let the robot delete it soon. Ok, Ihardlythinkso (talk) 08:51, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission CubicShogi[edit]

Hello Prilin. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled CubicShogi.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/CubicShogi}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 19:00, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]