User talk:Private10

March 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Model Farms High School, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -Mschel 00:49, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Model Farms High School. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. +A.0u 00:55, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Model Farms High School (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 01:21, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Model Farms High School, you will be blocked from editing. Auto^cracy 01:31, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Private10, you are very close to a block for editing past the above final warning. Please refrain from editing until this dispute has been resolved. Thank you. +A.0u 01:55, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In reply: Well, I think we should just wait until an advocate arrives. +A.0u 02:04, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am happy to advocate and try and reach a resolution on this - please see the "Issues" section below. Orderinchaos78 07:41, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In reply

Yes, it may be accurate, but can you insert a citation? (Wikipedia:No original research) I'd appreciate it if you would not insert unnecessary things into my user space - hence the warning above. In addition, I don't think I meant my comment to be a personal attack; I commented on your content, not about you. There's a difference. +A.0u 01:23, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will be happy to partake in whatever dispute resolution process you can start with the community, but I do ask that you not make any more unsubstantiated claims that are easily reguarded as vandalism. We welcome whatever you can do to help the project, but please do avoid spending too much time with issues described in WP:LAWYER. Good luck on Wikipedia :) Auto^cracy 01:46, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 01:58, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello Private10! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! +A.0u 02:40, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Attribution • Neutral point of view • Notability Conflict of interest • Autobiography Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Citing sources • Footnotes Image use policy • Copyrights • Fair use External links • Spam • Vandalism Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry What Wikipedia is not • Deletion policy

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article Perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Well, I wasn't aware that you were new, so this may help. +A.0u 02:40, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Issues

Hi, I'm an advocate and have been asked by Private10 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) to try and assist - from what little I know so far, it would appear that the issue is one of a new user who does not yet understand Wikipedia policies and protocols. I'd be happy to review any contributions by this user that are brought to my attention and perhaps make suggestions that could be used to turn this situation around so we can make the best use of an editor who intends to contribute positively. Orderinchaos78 07:39, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Page blanking

One I notice right away - blanking a page for any reason is considered bad form on Wikipedia. I suspect from the incidence I saw that it may well have been accidental - but it is seen as vandalism by many Wikipedia editors and administrators and is actively discouraged on Wikipedia. Orderinchaos78 07:43, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Yep it was an accident.I cant seem to get on to adminstrator who bloked me Can't sleep, clown will eat me.

Appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Private10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made a mistake and i am sorry at the time i was familiar with the rules and polices of wikipdeia i in future will follow these polices I also aplogise to any one offened by the actions.I also do not believe an indefitne ban is appropriate in this situation.I also think the guideline Please do not bite the newcomers has not been followed in this situation and applied by the adminstrator in this case.I also wish to note that i have been unabe to contact the adminstrator at this stage after sevral attempts

Decline reason:

Your creation of a fake RfC as one of your first edits indicates you are an experienced troll. Any further e-mails by you will be automatically deleted. — Sandstein 10:30, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Can you explain to us what you did wrong and agree that you won't do it again? Sandstein 09:15, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In reply to your e-mail:

I vandilised a page and i agree not to do this again and follow wikipedias guidlines,polices and rules on edditing in the future

I will request comment by the blocking admin. Sandstein 09:34, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In reply to your mail, "May i ask how long it will take for comment by blocking admin", I don't know. It depends on how active they are. Please communicate here instead of sending me e-mails. Sandstein 09:41, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi sandstein It would be appreciated if this ban was resolved tonight. Thank you--Private10 10:24, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very quick one - when you make comments on a talk page, don't forget to sign them - this can be done by entering ~~~~ after them. That puts your username and a datestamp on the talk page. Orderinchaos78 10:20, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your email I am going to have to pass, my judgment is that you have been trolling and vandalizing. I cannot unblock you at this time, this is between you and your blocking admin. ~ Arjun 15:24, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Second chance

Your request for unblocking has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
- If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.
Click View source on that article.
Copy and paste the contents of that page at the bottom of your talk page under a new top-level heading (like this: = Article title =)
Propose some significant and well researched improvements to your article by editing your personal copy of the article.
When are you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{helpme|your question here}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Walton^talk 12:44, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have unprotected your userpage for your second chance. Walton^talk 17:06, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]