User talk:Ptrwatson418

Welcome!

Hello, Ptrwatson418, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like God's death punishments, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! E Wing (talk) 16:08, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of God's death punishments

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. E Wing (talk) 16:08, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to God in Judaism. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please stop trying to add this personal commentary/synthesis to Wikipedia. See WP:NOR. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:29, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on God in Judaism. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. GARDEN 21:39, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Raymond Kurzweil

Hi, I was just wondering why you blanked the "stance on religion" section. I'm afraid I've reverted it. However, if you had a good reason, feel free to change it back, though I suggest you use an informative edit summary to explain your rationale. Regards, Whisky drinker (talk) 00:24, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There were two religion sections: "stance on religion" and "religion". I just combined them... But it is ok now. I have transfered all what was in the "religion" section to the "stance on religion" section. 00:27, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Church of Tarvuism

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Church of Tarvuism, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — Timneu22 · talk 18:17, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Church of Tarvuism

A tag has been placed on Church of Tarvuism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 18:18, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Church of Tarvuism, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 18:23, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is not vandalism! The church of Tarvuism is getting big. As you can see here http://www.tarvu.com/. It can be a parody religion or a religion. It doesn't matter because this church receives a massive attention and needs to be documented on the WIKI page. Ptrwatson418 (talk) 11:31, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the page and wrote everything in my OWN words - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_of_Tarvuism. Please check if it ok now Ptrwatson418 (talk) 11:42, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You just got slapped with a RSD, CSD A7 again. Re-write it so to clearly point out it's a parody, establish why a joke from '08 is relevant (good luck - offical page member numbers refers to source that seems fictional), then protest the RSD. Delete it and you're most likely a goner (no threat, since I can't and won't block you. Just experience). Regards, --G-41614 (talk) 11:56, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Church of Tarvuism

A tag has been placed on Church of Tarvuism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Empty Buffer (talk) 11:52, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You beat me to it. Still, gone already. --G-41614 (talk) 11:57, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]