User talk:Qtpoc-historian

This is Qtpoc-historian's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Feroza Syed has been accepted[edit]

Feroza Syed, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tagishsimon (talk) 02:20, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Qtpoc-historian, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Qtpoc-historian! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

[Feroza Syed][edit]

Heya.

I'm concerned that this article you created/are the major contributor to may not meet our requirements for establishing notability of living people, but I am also conscious that establishing notability for trans women, especially trans women of colour, is significantly more difficult than a lot of other BLPs.

However, the WP:NBLP rules are a set of bright-line rules that are intended to protect both the project and the subject of articles.

So, let's talk about that and see if we can either find some more sources that better establish notability of this article subject, or perhaps move the article back to draft status for the time being, until the sourcing to establish notability is available.

Cheers, A

-- a ^{they/them | argue | contribs} 19:23, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alfie - Thank you for reaching out via this Talk page. Please point to which aspects of the BLP requirements are not met? I had already reviewed those requirements and found that this individual, who as you say is a trans person of color who should be considered with that perspective, does meet the criteria of notability, given the third party sources in Atlanta and nationally that have written about her work and achievements. I can work on further updates in coming weeks, but I don't think this article should be moved to Drafts. It has already been reviewed and approved by multiple other editors who have contributed across Wikipedia and is linked from another Wikipedia page. This individual should be part of the foundation of knowledge on Wikipedia, as we ensure that Wikipedia accurately and fairly incorporates the history of the queer trans community of color. Before you make any changes I do ask that you continue a discussion and we consider on appropriate steps based on your specific observations. Qtpoc-historian (talk) 01:43, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Daily Mail reference at Feroza Syed[edit]

Hi. Please do not use the Daily Mail as you did at Feroza Syed. It is not a reliable source. See WP:DAILYMAIL. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 20:29, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brigitte Bidet (March 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:GNG. I'm not seeing much media coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brigitte Bidet and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Brigitte Bidet, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clarityfiend (talk) 01:03, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]