User talk:Quantum1278

May 2016

Hello, I'm Dcirovic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to The Vaudevillains— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dcirovic (talk) 15:34, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Real Racing 3

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Real Racing 3, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 12:19, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Real Racing 3

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Real Racing 3, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 12:26, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did at Qadian, you may be blocked from editing. PepperBeast (talk) 02:43, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is not disruptive editing and defamatory. It is the fact and reality of the Ahmaddiya community. I have provided every evidence of the information I uploaded, you can even confirm it from other sources that they are non-muslim minority and can't even go for pilgrimage. If you have any self-respect left then I think that you will let the information stay on thr page and let the world know of their reality otherwise I think you are a coward who sits behind his computer and is a Qadiyani himself. Quantum1278 (talk) 05:15, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a soapbox for your religious opinions. Also, your comments above are very, very close to personal attacks on another editor. PohranicniStraze (talk) 06:05, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a religious opinion. Go and check out the constitution and laws passed on these so called "Ahmaddiya Community". Not mentioning these laws will be like hiding the truth and real face of Ahmaddiya community. Quantum1278 (talk) 06:13, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Qadian. PepperBeast (talk) 14:20, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bold edits, though they may precede consensus or be inconsistent with prior consensus, are not vandalism unless other aspects of the edits identify them as vandalism. The Wikipedia community encourages users to be bold, and acknowledges the role of bold edits in reaching consensus. What is your reply to this?? Quantum1278 (talk) 14:27, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmadiyya Muslims call themselves Muslims, and reliable sources say that they are Muslims, so they are Muslims. Wikipedia is not censored and is written from a neutral point of view. Your anti-Ahmadi opinions are not relevant. The Government of Pakistan and its anti-Ahmadi bigotry are irrelevant. This has been discussed extensively. PepperBeast (talk) 14:34, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No they are not irrelevant. The whole Muslim Community around the world considers the Ahmadis as non-muslim. The government of Pakistan has gone one step further and declared them non-muslim in their constitution. So calling them muslim, when the whole muslim community from around the world considers them non-muslims is not true and it is unjust with the whole muslim community. The two holy cities of Islam i.e. Mecca and Medina have banned these non-muslim from entering their land. So can you please explain that how all this is irrelevant? Quantum1278 (talk) 14:44, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

According to your analogy, if Cockroaches call themselves as Lions, so they will be considered Lions because they think so?? Your analogy is flawed my brother. Quantum1278 (talk) 14:46, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We already discuss the issues between the majority of Muslims and Ahmadis in the last paragraph in the lead. In Christianity there are similar situations - I doubt any orthodox Christians would call Mormons Christians, but they consider themselves Christians and as we are secular encyclopedia we don't block that. Please don't use PBUH in edits, see MOS:ISLAM. I'm blocking you from editing the article until you agree to follow WP:NPOV and WP:RS and show that you understand them.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Qadian and Ahmaddiyya) for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 15:47, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]