User talk:R1237h

What do I do now with regards to the UnXeptable article?[edit]

Sorry for the question, but now what? You have made some corrections (thank you, by the way), but what is the next step on the road to having the article published and linked to the Hebrew version?

R1237h (talk) 07:26, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: UnXeptable (October 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:UnXeptable and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:41, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, R1237h! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:41, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, R1237h. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:UnXeptable, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:43, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution of Hebrew WP source content[edit]

Shalom, Ron! From yesterday's Edit-a-thon, it appears that you've considerably expanded the Micha Michaely page by translating content from the corresponding page on the Hebrew Wikipedia. This process involves the following follow-up actions:

On the Talk:Micha Michaely page:
- Open a new topic with the title: Source attribution for expanded content (or similar)
- As the Hebrew:English translator, licensing requirements involve adding the Template:Translated page with identifying content (relevant parameters provided):
  {{translated page|he|מיכה מיכאלי|version=37725498|insertversion=1192997232}}
Once this is done, I'll remove Micha Michaely from the Category:Articles needing translation from Hebrew Wikipedia by deleting the template that appears at the top of the page in the English WP

You're welcome to ask me any questions that may arise. -- Deborahjay (talk) 10:50, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yad Labanim[edit]

Hi there! I see that you created a new article about Yad Labanim. Since it has no references, I moved it to Draft:Yad Labanim. I suggest working on it in draftspace and submitting it for review when you think it's ready to be an article. I've added a template to the top of the draft for you. Happy editing! GoingBatty (talk) 04:27, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Thank you! It shows published, but that can't be right...? I am trying to find a way to link the Hebrew version with the English one. I did the translation, added links and images. Now trying to figure out how to link....

Happy/appreciate for whatever advice/help you can give. R1237h (talk) 05:18, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I moved it to Draft:Yad Labanim, and it appears you recreated it at Yad Labanim. GoingBatty (talk) 02:47, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. Don't know how I did it.... I cannot find the particular newspapers that the original letter was sent to, but did find one newspaper that reported the newspaper that notified that this worked, and that the organization will be set up. This is from a website in hebrew that talks about the "Mother of Yad Labanim". They do mention that the original letter was sent to newspapers, but not which ones. Do I take that part out, or is this enough?

R1237h (talk) 05:37, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You should first gather your reliable sources, and then write the article based on those sources. (Reliable sources do not have to be in English.) Anything you wrote based on your knowledge that is unsourced should be removed. GoingBatty (talk) 05:51, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The page Yad Labanim has been expanded beyond what's on Draft:Yad Labanim, so the latter needs to be deleted to avoid having a duplicate of that content. @GoingBatty:, what would you advise, such as adding a Template:Delete on the Draft page with the reason: "Page has been created in Mainspace" or similar? -- Deborahjay (talk) 09:09, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Deborahjay: How about R1237h adds {{Db-author}} to the top of the draft and uses an edit summary of "Page was recreated and expanded in Mainspace"? GoingBatty (talk) 05:10, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Reuven Opher[edit]

Hello, R1237h,

Thank you for creating Reuven Opher.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

A good start. However, while you have described his life well you have not established notability. For this he would need a strong publication record with many citations, which he does not appear to have, and/or major recognition from international scientific organizations of his contributions. Perhaps you can trim some of the CV details, which are not so informative, and find some independent awards and other recognitions of his notability in the community. Then resubmit, at present it would be premature to have this article as it is.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Ldm1954 (talk) 01:12, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reuven Opher moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Reuven Opher. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and awards or similar recognition, please see talk page. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ldm1954 (talk) 01:14, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Surface imperfections[edit]

I would be happy for your help in review of my draft. Thanks! Pixie.ca (talk) 06:03, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]