User talk:RachelRice

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Edit request for Sophie Hunter page[edit]

Can you please insert this parameter to Sophie Hunter's page as she has notable family members. You can just copy-paste the one I've coded below and just replace the parentheses with brackets for linking. The sources are in the page's family section. Thank you very much and keep up the good work you do here on Wiki! 89.144.230.37 (talk) 02:40, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

RachelRice, it would seem that this IP is actually a blocked sock wanting to get content readded that was deleted because of his socky-ness. -- WV 03:05, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

DAMN YOU RACHELRICE!!!!!!!!

List of EastEnders characters (2015)[edit]

Please don't add back relatives to Pearl that she has not interacted or shared a storyline with. Only Denise and Kim hold any notable significance to her at the moment. Please take some time to read Wikipedia:WikiProject Soap Operas#Character relationships and Template:Infobox soap character#Relationship parameters. Thanks. - JuneGloom07 Talk 01:39, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

A cookie for you![edit]

Choco chip cookie.png Please give me cookies!

Oh and by the way! Why did you delete my message on EastEnders characters! That wasn't really nice! Please get it back for me or I will send in my banana monkeys to kill you! So please bring it back or the banana monkeys! From your best friend, TheSimpsonsStuff! P.S. Banana monkeys are coming for you! TheSimpsonsStuff (talk) 16:34, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 19 April[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Vote to Save[edit]

Hi, just to let you know that Channel 5 haven't updated the FAQ's on their website as it still refers to the last Celebrity series. So I doubt the Save format will return this year. --MSalmon (talk) 09:19, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Oh, sorry about that! — RachelRice (talk, contribs) — 10:06, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
It's ok --MSalmon (talk) 10:19, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
They have updated the FAQ's and it is Vote to Evict as usual --MSalmon (talk) 19:21, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Okay, thanks. — RachelRice (talk, contribs) — 21:53, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Big Brother 16 (UK), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Channel 5 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Vincent Hubbard.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vincent Hubbard.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 3[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shabnam Masood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sands (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

User:RachelRice/List of EastEnders episodes (2015)[edit]

Hi, I was wondering, in this draft, how do you decide which guest characters to include? I added Adam Wallace because he's been in four episodes and is mentioned in plots, but now so is Harry Fielding who only appears in one episode. –anemoneprojectors– 13:39, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

I usually just include people who have been a part of a storyline. People who are there but have only had one appearance are guest characters, I add them if their role as a guest character was significant. I shy away from including police officers and nurses (except for Keeble and Cameron), since, although they can appear frequently, it's usually only in a couple scenes. I think it does need a bit of clearing up though. — RachelRice (talk, contribs) — 15:43, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
So would that mean Harry Fielding should be included? Personally I would most likely add everyone that has a named character, as we do in the character lists, and it wouldn't mean having an opinion on who is significant and who isn't. But maybe that's just me. What do you think? I was actually in the process of counting appearances for 2014 when you added them to my draft, so if you hadn't and I'd carried on, I'd probably have added more characters. –anemoneprojectors– 16:19, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
If you think someone should be included then fire away, add them. I know I've missed quite a few people out. As long as the list doesn't get stupidly big, that is! :-) — RachelRice (talk, contribs) — 17:21, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
I'll have a look and see what I think... Can I ask if you have a quick way of counting the appearances? –anemoneprojectors– 17:36, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Having a quick look at who is in the 2015 characters list - I think Margaret Badini should be put back because of the number of episodes (12 is a lot for a doctor in one year!) Maybe Helen Stritch QC, Adrian Quinlan QC and Judge St. John Redmond because they had 6 eps each, were part of a high-profile storyline, were mentioned in the press as upcoming cast, and all the actors have Wikipedia articles. I'd also put Jonathan Malnet in there because I think when June is completed, he might be mentioned, and obviously Harry Fielding I've already mentioned. What do you think about those? The others are probably not worth mentioning. –anemoneprojectors– 17:44, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Yep, sounds good! — RachelRice (talk, contribs) — 18:20, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

I was just thinking: what about Tracey the barmaid? She's bound to be mentioned in an upcoming episode, but isn't usually credited for her appearances, making an episode count pretty difficult. –anemoneprojectors– 08:06, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

She's just an extra so I don't think it would be right to include her. — RachelRice (talk, contribs) — 15:33, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
In fact it's tonight's episode, where Kathy phones her at the Vic. If the list of cast features everyone who is mentioned in the episode synopses then she'd have to be included. –anemoneprojectors– 15:43, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Could we perhaps put (1 episode) for her and leave a note to say that this is her only credited appearance? — RachelRice (talk, contribs) — 15:48, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
That sounds better. If it works out that we don't need to mention her, then we don't need to list her, but I can't see that happening :-) –anemoneprojectors– 16:10, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
In your next update of the cast appearances, can you add in the jury foreman, even though he was unnamed, as he is mentioned for a few of the episodes. Also Sami Jackson and Hazel Warren (just want to make sure these guest characters aren't forgotten). Thanks Face-smile.svganemoneprojectors– 08:36, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
I added them for you. Also, the new Dennis Rickman Jnr actor needs to be included, but I'm not sure of his episode count, is it just one at the moment? :-) –anemoneprojectors– 18:36, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
What I did for 2014 for Bobby was put both the actors' names (separated by '&'), this way we have an episode count for the character rather than the actor. — RachelRice (talk, contribs) — 19:15, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Oh, I see. But the 2014 draft in my userspace only has Eliot Carrington listed, not Rory Stroud. –anemoneprojectors– 21:25, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Must've been deleted or something, I'll switch it back. — RachelRice (talk, contribs) — 15:33, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Did you?[edit]

Did you not get a notification for this? I could really use the feedback. [1] --LulzWhateven (talk) 14:25, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Yes I did, I'm just waiting for others to reply. I've said all I needed to say on the matter it's just up to others whether they want to agree or disagree. — RachelRice (talk, contribs) — 15:33, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Why won't they reply? I don't understand. I think it can be constructive. It's making me sad. I put an effort into it and nobody gives a flying fuck. --LulzWhateven (talk) 19:49, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Celebrity Big Brother 16[edit]

How am I being disruptive? On every other Big Brother article, the word "Final" is under the last week or day, not above. And the font is always a percentage, not a point. You're being obtuse by changing it away from what the norm always is. BlueDevil54 (talk) 16:44, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

BlueDevil54, 9pt used to be the same as 90%, but Wikipedia changed the skins which made the font larger, which means we have to change to 85% as 90% is now too big. You keep enlarging the font when it should NOT be that big. — RachelRice (talk, contribs) — 21:53, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
There is nothing wrong with 90%, the chart fits on the page right now at 90%. If the chart eventually stretches the page, it can go to 85%, but as of now its fine. BlueDevil54 (talk) 23:16, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Except it's always been 85% (9pt). Why change now? — RachelRice (talk, contribs) — 08:08, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
I can't be bothered, you're clearly not listening. — RachelRice (talk, contribs) — 08:09, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

TOC and accessibility[edit]

If you had read my edit summary on List of Doctor Who serials, you would have noticed that the placement of the ToC is for accessibility reasons. Per WP:LEAD, Users of screen readers expect the table of contents to follow the introductory text; they will also miss any text placed between the ToC and the first heading. Your placement made it so the four paragraphs of the lead disappeared for screen reader users. Also, the correct placement of the ToC never affected the table as you stated in your edit summary.

Doctor Who[edit]

Hey, RR. Here's my concerns on the entry for the Eighth Doctor's television movie in the Series Overview table. There's two ways to view it. 1) Viewing it as a movie itself, there's no way to determine when a movie stopped it's original airing worldwide, much like typical movies released now. 2) Viewing it as a single episode, it is only released, giving it a singular release date, and no ending date, just like any episode released between 1963 and now. In both of these, no ending date exists. If you have opposing views, I'd definitely be interested in hearing them (ping me). Alex|The|Whovian 11:23, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Would Night of the Doctor be any significance, the eighth Doctor was in this one aswell.--Lerdthenerd wiki defender 11:31, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
No, as the entry in the Series Overview is specifically for the television movie, not specifically for the Eighth Doctor. Alex|The|Whovian 11:37, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello AlexTheWhovian. The reason I thought 12 May should be stretched to both boxes, is because "last aired" refers to when the season last aired, and not the episode. Although the TV movie isn't a season, we seem to be treating it as such by including it in the table. Plus, it's listed as a TV movie so I don't think cinema screenings would count anyway. — RachelRice (talk, contribs) — 13:21, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

EastEnders episodes[edit]

Hi RachelRice, I have recently been looking for another project to get involved with on Wikipedia and have noticed yours and AnemoneProjectors work with the EastEnders episodes. I am really interested in helping you both out and building on the great articles you currently have. If you would be willing to accept my offer, I would be much grateful and able to start assisting you straight away.

Thanks, Soaper1234 (talk) 13:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi Soaper1234. I would say you are free to help. The main part that needs help in the 2015 episodes list is the completion of June and July's storylines, as Rachel stopped in June and I started in August! Other than that, there is a list at User:AnemoneProjectors/List of EastEnders episodes of work in progress, and you are more than welcome to edit any of the existing pages or even to start the red linked ones, either using the BBC site to list older episodes, or some other realiable source where the BBC does not have the older information (consider that some sites may not have complete information). The existing ones mainly need updating to the format of the 2015 list. Hopefully, when old episodes are added, the numbers will run perfectly from 1 to 5192! If they don't, I'm not sure how to fix it. I think I already found a problem somewhere along the line. AnemoneProjectors 11:43, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Hey, are you back? Nice to see you if you are. As you can probably see, we've come a long way with the episodes lists. We're currently trying to work out the episode numbers! All discussion has been centralised at User talk:AnemoneProjectors/List of EastEnders episodes. anemoneprojectors 15:24, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
I'm on and off, but I'll be helping out whenever I can! — RachelRice (talk, contribs) — 15:37, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Tracey[edit]

Hi I have a look at you List of EastEnders Episodes (2015), it's really good and very well detailed. I read a note on the bottom mentioning that an episode this year was Tracey's only credited appearance but according to IMDB http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0805510/ she has been credited before and I have found such an example on the BBC site from 2011 http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01685y8

I hope you find this information useful Thanks Kelvin 101 (talk) 00:42, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

@Kelvin 101: It means her only credited episode in 2015, not ever. Have any 2015 credited appearances been missed off? Remembering that IMDb isn't a reliable source. AnemoneProjectors 10:30, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Doctor Who (series 9)#Episode Groupings[edit]

I would like to invite you to contribute to a discussion on whether or not "The Girl Who Died" and "The Woman Who Lived" and "Heaven Sent" and "Hell Bent" are two-parters. Over the course of 3 weeks and 2 discussions, only 3 editors including myself have contributed, so it would be a great help if you could take the time to contribute. Fan4Life (talk) 20:27, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, RachelRice. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lucy Beale death.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lucy Beale death.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 10 June 2017 (UTC)