User talk:Ragueneau

Your submission at Articles for creation: Extirpator of Idolatries (October 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Extirpator of Idolatries and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 11:16, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Ragueneau, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 11:16, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Extirpator of Idolatries has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Extirpator of Idolatries. Thanks! Atlantic306 (talk) 23:38, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Extirpator of Idolatries has been accepted

Extirpator of Idolatries, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Atlantic306 (talk) 18:09, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

December 2020

Hello Ragueneau. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Oswaldo Salas, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Ragueneau. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ragueneau|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:40, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi, through this paragraph I declare that I have not received, do not receive, nor will I receive any payment for my contributions on wikipedia. _signed, User:Ragueneau

Can you clarify whether you have any connection to Oswaldo Salas or his work? _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:09, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

No, I have no connection with Oswaldo Salas or his work. _signed, User:Ragueneau

Can you explain why over the course of 3 years editing Wikipedia you appear to have almost exclusively made edits related to Oswaldo Salas and his films? _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:30, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Because unfortunately in the Peruvian artistic environment there are very few artists, to say almost no one, who have obtained the recognitions that he has obtained. If there were more relevant Peruvian artists to be able to publish on wikipedia, with reliable sources, I would. User:Ragueneau

Nomination of Holestepper for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Holestepper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holestepper until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BOVINEBOY2008 22:09, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:20, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, as you did at Oswaldo Salas. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

• Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
• State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
• Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:59, 28 December 2020 (UTC)