User talk:Rando321

This is Rando321's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome

Hello, Rando321, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! - wolf 00:02, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kim Jong Gil (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mcmatter were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kim Jong Gil and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 23:29, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rando321! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 23:29, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Please stop. If you continue to attempt to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia as you did at Eritrea and adding unsourced information, you may be blocked from editing. Cookiemonster1618 (talk) 22:55, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My source is literally another wikipedia article, you water balloon. Stop reverting constructive edits. (talk) 17:02, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Eritrea. {{subst:unsgned|Cookiemonster1618}}

So true. I confirm. VosleCap (talk) 17:04, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear, Rando321, Wikipedia is not a reliable source and cannot be used to verify content between articles (see WP:CIRCULAR). If you continue to restore the disputed content without consensus, you may very well find yourself blocked again, either for edit warring or, if it continues, incivility. I don't know what game you and VosleCap are playing, but it needs to stop.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:31, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Where is the incivility lol VosleCap (talk) 17:35, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, you lemon. Stop vandalising my page. My edit to Eritrea is just and conclusive and is being improperly and unnecessarily reverted. Stop being unruly and dishonouring this website's aim of providing factual, up-to-date information. You are essentially being an Eritrean puppet, claiming they have an actual active legislature. Rando321 (talk) 17:38, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you continue to restore the unreliable information again and attacking me you will indefinitely be blocked from editing on Wikipedia along with your sockpuppet account. Cookiemonster1618 (talk) 17:40, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
VosleCap is not my 'sockpuppet', you watermelon. You have continued to vandalise my page and prevent legitimate edits. Continue to do this and I will be forced to report this as it is completely unnecessary and unjust. Rando321 (talk) 20:21, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have not vandalized anything of your page idc if its your sockpuppet account or not but if you continue to threaten me and verbally attack me you will be reported to the administrators and will find yourself permanently banned from editing on Wikipedia. Cookiemonster1618 (talk) 20:29, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am not threatening you with anything other than administrative action, which is appropriate for what you are doing, which is vandalising my page and performing unnecessary reversions of my constructive edits completely unjustly. I am only requesting that you cease immediately. Rando321 (talk) 20:30, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
SO TRUE! These claims of me being a so-called "sockpuppet" (idk if thats even an english word but lets assume it is) are VERY FALSE! MAGA! VosleCap (talk) 20:33, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

your edits were reverted because they were not sourced from a reliable source and you know that. The administrator themselves told you this, should I bring them back again and report you for threatening me?. If not than this conversation is over. Cookiemonster1618 (talk) 20:41, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Like I have already said, I am not threatening you with anything other than administrative action, which is appropriate for what you are doing. Perhaps you are unable or have difficulty reading? Rando321 (talk) 20:42, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Abdramane Tchiani

By lord, the most merciful, what is your opinion on Brigade General Hon. Doctor Abdramane Tchiani MP OBE? VosleCap (talk) 17:19, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

He is my dad, so I have a quite biased opinion! Rando321 (talk) 17:20, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thats unfortunate! The National Council for the Safeguard of the Homeland is declaring war on Burkina Faso. VosleCap (talk) 17:21, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am actually the Vice President of the National Council for the Safeguard of the Homeland. In addition, I am also the Assistant Chief of the Main Directorate of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation! Rando321 (talk) 17:22, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. I am the chief pornstar for the Presidency of the Congo VosleCap (talk) 17:23, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User talk:Untamed1910 has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Untamed1910 (talk) 21:13, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 21:41, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]