User talk:Rarcntv

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rarcntv (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here rarcntv (talk) 17:07, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 17:23, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What I see your company do not explain reason. failed to do with valid reason so they can not know the answer then block it. if you believe it god. you have to explain this sooner or later. or something will coming for you. mark my comment!. a day Wikipedia will try to post about me. and I will lawsuit Wikipedia because of publish my news. wikipedia will vanish due to their bad policy or employee!. just mark the comment! . I am taking screenshot today too. I show details with what you did. and can not answer. so funny you blocked it!. do it.

This is completely incoherent. I suspect you are violating WP:NLT but I can't actually tell because your paragraph makes no sense. --Yamla (talk) 17:23, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

rarcntv (talk) 17:07, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/rarcntv. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Topher385 (talk) 02:25, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

A user page is so that you can tell us a bit about yourself whereas an article page is for an encyclopaedia article. If it's about a person, it must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. It is now Wikipedia policy that biographical articles about living people must have independent verifiable references, or they will be deleted.

Whether the content is on a user page or in an article, it must be written in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Your content seemed to be self-promotion or a CV. I can't see any evidence that you meet the notability guidelines, and you seem to be advertising your services rather than contributing to the encyclopaedia. This is not a social media site, why not try Linkedin? Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:53, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

rarcntv (talk) 20:09, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, You said I need reference and something now I have reference public news paper and articles including google news.

you can check some news . journalist talk about me.

http://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/2985916

So I want to create Kazi Jakaria Rarcntv Riad Page.

That's not a journalist talking about you, that's a press release. It says so right at the top. --Yamla (talk) 19:32, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hi, thanks for message.

you need independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that you meet the notability guidelines. It is now Wikipedia policy that biographical articles about living people must have independent verifiable references, as defined in the link, or they will be deleted. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to you or your company, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what you claim or interviewing you or your company management management. Your supposed refrence is a press release by your company quoting what you say, obviously not an independent source. IMDB, incidentally, can be self-edited, so that's not acceptable either. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, not just a list at the end.
As I said above, your text made no obvious claim of notability and was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Yours seemed to be a CV or job application
You have a conflict of interest when editing this article. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that you are notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Wikipedia:Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Wikipedia:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest and WP:Autobiography. You should not write about yourself here, use social media instead

Jimfbleak (talk) 05:40, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yunshui ^雲 _水 16:08, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributions and messages strongly suggest that your only purpose here is self-promotion. We don't permit that, so there is no reason to continue to allow you to edit. Yunshui ^雲 _水 16:09, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]