User talk:Rars07

Sarah Geronimo

Hi Rars07. I'm sorry, I won't change the rating because the sources as a whole, in my opinion, don't conform to the standard set out by Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Best wishes Hekerui (talk) 14:25, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted some of your edits again: adding whitespace is not necessary, and the headings you added ("Unstoppable Success," "The Next One and Record Breaker Success," etc.) are simply not encyclopedic. I urge you to consider that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a fansite, and that all content must be verifiable using reliable sources. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 17:31, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the work you are doing trying to improve the article, but improvement (from C-status, which isn't very good) needs two things: encyclopedic writing (that is, objective writing) and reliable sources. Drop me a line (on my talk page, not my user page) if you have any questions. Thanks, Drmies

Sources

The best sources would be newspapers. Blogs and gossip mags aren't reliable sources. Woogee (talk) 04:46, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also useful when reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 05:48, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:57, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rars, please use talk pages, not user pages, for comments. Anyway, thanks for your note. No, I wouldn't say that all the sources are reliable, because I haven't looked at all of them. The ones you added in the last few edits seem OK to me (I checked a few of them), so that's good. But make sure that you don't re-add unsourced information, such as the platinum claims, and also make sure that citations are properly attributed and inserted into the text. Happy editing, Drmies (talk) 06:03, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Happy new year, Rars! Drmies (talk) 07:33, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edits, summaries

Hey Rars, I'm looking at the article, but I have to ask you two things rightaway, for your own benefit and that of other editors: a. please use edit summaries (see Help:Edit summary), and b. combine the many small edits you make into bigger edits by using preview (see Help:Show preview)--if you look at the article history, you'll see that you made some sixty edits in two days, and many of them small ones; such cluttering of the article history makes it difficult to navigate and to figure out what happened when. Thanks. Drmies (talk) 17:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think you've done a really good job finding decent sources, and that much of the information in the article is pretty well verified (the sales numbers and platinum stuff and all that, that's important too). A heading like "Phenomenal Success: 2008-Present" has to go, of course--that's not encyclopedic in terms of tone. You could consider splitting that entire biography into two music and acting sections. In a few paragraphs I made some edits, and careful editing for grammar and style should be applied across the board. I think you've put a lot of those references in templates, and there's more that can be cleaned up in that way (look at the References, and you'll see a whole bunch that are just a title with a link). But the article is certainly a lot better than it was before, so good for you! Next step, after another round of proofreading (and you can probably cut some of the detail, such as I did in that Michael Jackson section), is to have a look at Wikipedia:Good article criteria and then at Wikipedia:Good article nominations. If, after more clean-up, you submit this for a review (right now I don't think it would pass, mainly because it needs more copy editing) you will get some good feedback on what to do and how to do it. Good luck! Drmies (talk) 17:58, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Sarah

As for the article, I think you made it too grandiose, which, in this case, means too fluffy and excessive. Try looking and reading the featured articles about people first before making any changes, and you'll understand why some other editors and I notified you about it. Blake Gripling (talk) 13:09, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Geronimo IMAGES!

Hi there! I think there's a problem in this images:

File:Sarah Geronimo Alone.JPG
File:The Other Side of Sarah Geronimo.JPG
File:Sarah Geronimo THE NEXT ONE CONCERT.JPG
File:Sarah Geronimo In Motion1.JPG

I don't understand why you tag this images as violating the copyright? then you delete it! The Images is my own work and shots. If there are other kinds of these pictures in the net, well some pictures may look like the same from the internet, but no! it's my own pictures and copyrights. So it means that I didn't violate any of it! Sorry for my comment.. Hoping for your reply.--Rars07 (talk) 13:12, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you're talking about. I've never edited or deleted those images. User:Blakegripling ph has marked them as copyright violations, and User:PMDrive1061 has deleted them, but you'll have to ask them if you want to know why they did so. --Carnildo (talk) 21:47, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Rars. The images were deleted because they had no licensing information and were clearly not amateur photographs. Another user tagged them for deletion and I believe he did so correctly. Assuming good faith and assuming that you are in fact a professional photographer and took the pictures yourself, it would be best if you uploaded them off of your camera or a computer file on which you keep your photos and not the internet. That in turn would paste information about the camera and its settings at the time of the photograph which would help validate your claim of ownership. Frankly, if these photos are yours, I wouldn't give them away over here. If they aren't yours, they would have to be uploaded under a fair-use rationale. I would upload them not here but instead at Wikimedia Commons. There are very clear instructions over there as to what can an d cannot be uploaded. Some - but not all - photographs at Flikr can be uploaded to Commons. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:54, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind; it appears that you've uploaded them again and that you did get them from your Flikr account under the correct license. It's just that copyrights are taken very seriously here; I hope you'll remember that in the future. Best, --PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:59, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You bet. :) Glad it worked out and thanks much for your help. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:03, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rars07 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Blake Gripling (talk) 00:42, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Sarah Geronimo THE NEXT ONE CONCERT.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sarah Geronimo THE NEXT ONE CONCERT.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Blake Gripling (talk) 00:45, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sarah Geronimo In Motion1.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sarah Geronimo In Motion1.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Blake Gripling (talk) 00:46, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Other Side of Sarah Geronimo.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Other Side of Sarah Geronimo.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Blake Gripling (talk) 00:47, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry, copyright violations

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

I bought that line you fed me about those DVD video captures being yours; the sockpuppet just put you over the top. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:19, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rars07 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If you are reffering to user Revers07, he is my brother and not me. Regarding the IP address (125.60.173.98) I admit that it is our IP address and my brother, Revers07 use it when he doesn't have an account here in wikipedia. I'm begging you to remove this block because I only want to improve some articles like Sarah Geronimo article because I see that no one wants to make it better. Please unblock me, I believe my intentions are good and that is to contribute in this site and to make the "unotice" article better. --Rars07 (talk) 05:09, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not buying this given that the writing styles appear to be identical. —Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Boribori!)} 05:47, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

NOTE: User has editied his unblock rationale post-decline: [1] —Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Boribori!)} 06:01, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rars, this was a very bad idea from the get-go. There was no reason to resort to this, and it was obvious to anyone, including me, that Revers09 and Rars09 were the same person. Shame. Drmies (talk) 05:12, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sarah Geronimo - Dahil Minahal Mo Ako.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sarah Geronimo - Dahil Minahal Mo Ako.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:02, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sarah Geronimo If Only.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sarah Geronimo If Only.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:04, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sarah Geronimo Forever's Not Enough.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sarah Geronimo Forever's Not Enough.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:10, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sarah Geronimo Feat. Howie Dorough I'll Be There.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sarah Geronimo Feat. Howie Dorough I'll Be There.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:10, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sarah Geronimo Record Breaker.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sarah Geronimo Record Breaker.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:11, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SarahGeronimoTheNextOne.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SarahGeronimoTheNextOne.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:45, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]