User talk:Rastinrah

Welcome!

Hi Rastinrah! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Kj cheetham (talk) 21:08, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kianoush Nikkhah Kouchaksaraei

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kianoush Nikkhah Kouchaksaraei, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PRAXIDICAE🌈 21:32, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello Rastinrah. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Rastinrah. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Rastinrah|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PRAXIDICAE🌈 21:51, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have never received money from anyone. Because I know it is against the rules. The person for whom I wrote an article is now very well-known and all news outlets in my country and abroad have covered it. Search a bit and you will see that this person is one of the founders of artificial intelligence and network security in Iran. Thank you for understanding Thanks Rastinrah (talk) 21:58, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I never sell rules for money. I never write a useless article. I have written many useful articles in a short period of time. Be sure this article is also useful. Thanks Rastinrah (talk) 21:59, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Great, what's your connection to the subjects you've written about, then? PRAXIDICAE🌈 22:00, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have no connection. I am an unbiased editor my friend. I have read the rules. I apologize if I have done something against the rules. I had no such intention Rastinrah (talk) 22:03, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then you should have no problem explaining how this is your own work. PRAXIDICAE🌈 22:10, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can I continue my activity? Rastinrah (talk) 22:13, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond to PRAXIDICAE🌈's statement - how would you explain that this image is your own work if you have no connections to them. -Kj cheetham (talk) 22:43, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A festival was held today and this person won an award They interviewed him. I already knew who he was. I checked again and wrote an article for people's reference so that they can understand the importance of the issue. I know this issue is not important, but Ibn Hashem has a blue tick in all social networks. (Instagram, Telegram, Twitter) and... Rastinrah (talk) 22:48, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so how is the image your own work? PRAXIDICAE🌈 23:51, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hassan Rahmani is a photographer of festivals and famous people in Iran. With written consent, I have the right to publish and own the photos of this photographer. If needed, I can upload the documents. In a way, I am his authorized representative Rastinrah (talk) 00:12, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So you clearly have a connection you need to disclose. PRAXIDICAE🌈 00:19, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I emphasize again. I have read the rules many times and I am familiar with them. I try not to make mistakes. Rastinrah (talk) 00:14, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is no connection. Even the photographer is not relevant This is the job. Photography at festivals and celebrities. The relationship between me and the photographer is completely separate. Rastinrah (talk) 00:24, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I say it for the umpteenth time. I am an article creator and an unbiased editor. I have no connection with any of the people. Creating articles is my interest, not my source of profit Rastinrah (talk) 00:26, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So, the professional photographer hired by the subject is someone you represent but have no affiliation to the subject? I find that hard to believe. PRAXIDICAE🌈 00:27, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove the doubt from me. Because I never had the slightest connection with the famous people for whom the article. I write that I do not have Believe me please Rastinrah (talk) 00:27, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Never employed by the subject. It works independently. When a person is famous, does a reporter hire? They interview him independently without his knowledge Rastinrah (talk) 00:30, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I said everything I could to prove the lack of connection with the person. I ask you to think about my words And believe it Rastinrah (talk) 00:31, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can I have a request for revival and transfer to the draft? To improve the article there? Rastinrah (talk) 00:42, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Maziar Lorestani

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Maziar Lorestani, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.delgarm.com/%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%B2%DB%8C%D8%A7%D8%B1-%D9%84%D8%B1%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C-%D9%88-%D9%81%DB%8C%D9%84%D9%85-%D8%AC%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF%D8%B4.a268153. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PRAXIDICAE🌈 21:59, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Rastinrah. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:34, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can I have a request for revival and transfer to the draft? To improve the article there? Rastinrah (talk) 00:37, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ruhollah Dehghani Firouz Abadi

Hi there! In the Ruhollah Dehghani Firouz Abadi article, you added reference #8, which is displaying a "Check date values" error. Could you please fix this reference so it displays the proper date? Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 15:33, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ruhollah Dehghani Firouz Abadi moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ruhollah Dehghani Firouz Abadi. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 05:11, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ruhollah Dehghani Firouz Abadi has been accepted

Ruhollah Dehghani Firouz Abadi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Reading Beans (talk) 13:36, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]