User talk:Rawfannation101

Regarding your edits to Candice Michelle:

Your recent edit to Candice Michelle (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 04:34, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:C41.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:C41.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:06, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Candice Michelle

Please read Wikipedia's Image Use Policy on using copyrighted and licensed images. Thank you. Bmg916 ^{Speak to Me} 04:13, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Vince%27s_devils.jpg listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Vince's_devils.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. – riana_dzasta 04:23, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Vinces_Devils.jpg listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Vinces_Devils.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. – riana_dzasta 04:24, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:C4Candice.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:C4Candice.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:13, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your talk page

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Rawfannation101; this is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. please archive your talk page comments, rather than deleting them. Bmg916 ^{Speak to Me} 03:34, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to WWE Women's Championship

Your recent edit to WWE Women's Championship (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 21:33, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2007

Please do not assume ownership of articles such as Candice Michelle. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you. Bmg916^Speak_Sign 19:27, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop assuming ownership of articles such as Candice Michelle. Doing so may lead to disruptive behavior such as edit wars and is a violation of policy, which may lead to a block from editing. Bmg916^Speak_Sign 19:41, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Candice Michelle, you will be blocked from editing. You are assuming ownership of this article. Wikipedia is not censored, and its not disrespectful or libelious if she actually did it, which, it has been sourced, so, she actually did it. If you remove content that has been cited by a reliable source again, or assume ownership again, you will be blocked. Bmg916^Speak_Sign 01:38, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely due to persistent copyright violations and similar abuse issues. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 22:42, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rawfannation101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have only been adding information and I feel that me being blocked is unfair. One of my friends were going under my name and using it to fix up pages cause I was gone on vacation and attend work, so he had to of gone under my name, because I only added about her princess gimmick and that is it, so he must have had to hacked in. Sorry for any confusion. Blocking me from editing anything for one article is unfair as well. I promise to calm down and I want to help improve the quality of this article and block all vandalism and not spread it. But yet again it wasn't me, honestly.

Decline reason:

You have been vandalising. We don't care for vandalism here. I think you are confused. — Yamla 21:10, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Candicemichellepicture.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Candicemichellepicture.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 19:05, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Candicesmove.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Candicesmove.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 19:06, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Candice Michelle under GA review

Hi there, I see that you are a primary contributor to the article Candice Michelle. This article has come under review for Good article reassessment as part of GA Sweeps and problem has been identified and listed on the talk page. Please begin to address this point in the next seven days or the article will be delisted from GA and will have to go through the GAN process all over again to regain its status once improvements have been made. If you have any questions, please drop me a line.--Jackyd101 (talk) 17:20, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]