User talk:Redsolidarch

Chris Ennis

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Chris Ennis, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.york.ac.uk/res/atmoschem/Dr_Chris_Ennis.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:26, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Haitian Edible Rat

This page you created is essentially a duplicate of the Hispaniolan Edible Rat page, which is better sourced. You should consider merging your page with that one. See the Wikipedia help page on merging for details, or ask me if you need help.WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:50, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nicely merged! Happy editing!! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:57, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Todd Elkins

The article Todd Elkins has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 12:57, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Redsolidarch, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Nate 14 81 13:16, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Simon Skirrow

The edits you made to this page are not in the proper tone for Wikipedia. (I'll gloss over the fact that they are also a copyright violation for now.) Please keep your edits in the tone of an encyclopedia, not that of a football shoe ad.WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:38, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Simon Skirrow

The article Simon Skirrow has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 13:50, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Académie des gastronomes

A tag has been placed on Académie des gastronomes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Nate 14 81 15:02, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also,

A tag has been placed on Académie des Gastronomes, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page.

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Seems a shame the original article (which I never saw) was deleted. Mcewan (talk) 16:23, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Display logic

A tag has been placed on Display logic, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:44, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Alessio Guglielmi

A tag has been placed on Alessio Guglielmi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:45, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lakeland Open

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lakeland Open, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mattinbgn\^talk 08:44, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Music for horses

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Music for horses, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Music for horses is pure vandalism; this includes redirects created during cleanup of page move vandalism.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Music for horses, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot (talk) 15:10, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was not surprised to see this deleted but it is an important topic that deserves to be written up. Find some reliable sources and add a note on the subject to the horse article. I note passing refs in Equestrian drill team and Musical Ride. And does not music feature prominently in the performances of the Spanish Riding School? I have rescued your text to Talk:Horse#Music. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 21:33, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

list of Peregrine Falcons in popular culture

moved to user sandbox at User:Redsolidarch/List of Peregrine Falcons in popular culture

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 15:16, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]