User talk:Rekx

Your edits have been reverted but I giving you the benefit of the doubt and I am verifying the source. If she has both the article WILL state it68.194.18.81 (talk)

OK, its from an entertainment magazine, that does not meet Wikipedia standards for a verifiable source but, I don't think its false so, I've added it in the info box that she is Kenyan and Mexican and I've added it in the body of the article. Anything else will keep on bringing edit wars.68.194.18.81 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 08:39, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Of course it will come from an entertainment magazine. She is an entertainer!

The new york times is an entertainment mag but its credible. This is a gossip site. Look I am trying to work with you, it does not meet wiki's standard but I'm going to put it in the article if you don't like it I will submit it to the admin notice broad and I assure you, they will remove it68.194.18.81 (talk)

If you don't want to cooperate and want to keep on doing what your doing its fine by be get blocked.68.194.18.81 (talk)

I am just putting in accurate information. And the information from that page is from an interview, by the way. Do as you wish.

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.194.18.81 (talk) 08:57, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am notifying you the I have began filling out the report on the admin notice board. You must know just because you have different names your IP address wont change. We are both guilty of edit wars I am stating my claim at the notice board so please come and explain your edits with your valid sources. I tried to reach a consensus with your following wiki guidelines but clearly it didn't work68.194.18.81 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 09:08, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote, "I am not writing back to you again." I guess you didn't really mean it.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

I did mean it but, I had to warn for first its part of the process. Hopefully now the admins will decide.68.194.18.81 (talk) 09:42, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:54, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rekx, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Rekx! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:40, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Your recent editing history at Lupita Nyong'o shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 03:22, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Rekx reported by User:Tbhotch (Result: ). Thank you. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 03:33, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]