User talk:Rememberwhenrockwasyoung

Rememberwhenrockwasyoung, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Rememberwhenrockwasyoung! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Peter Boghossian sources

Hi, I noticed that your edit of Peter Boghossian on October 8th (This one: [1]) put in several sources that link to The Australian. Near as I can tell you used an automated tool to format those citations, because they all claim the titles of the articles are:

Subscribe to The Australian | Newspaper home delivery, website, iPad, iPhone & Android apps

That's clearly not correct. That's actually the page title that appears on the paywall screen that comes up for non-subscribers. You may be a subscriber, but whatever tool you used to format the citations grabbed the info from the pages in a way that made the website think a non-subscriber was trying to access it.

It is especially important that the metadata on citations that are behind paywalls be correct, since not all readers can see the article. Now, I would have fixed these for you, but I do not have a subscription to do so. Please fix these titles to correctly reflect the articles in question. Also, because this is behind a paywall, it would also be a good practice to add the following parameter in the citation template:

| url-access=subscription |

This will cause the wiki software will display an icon indicating the paywall for readers to save them some effort. Thank you. --Krelnik (talk) 12:17, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Update - I fixed two of them by finding the corresponding sources in the main article on that topic. Also note there is another citation to Herald Sun that has a similar paywall title. So there are three citations that need to be fixed right now. --Krelnik (talk) 12:27, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Grievance Studies Affair

Hello, Rememberwhenrockwasyoung. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Grievance Studies Affair".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 16:41, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Grievance Studies Affair concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Grievance Studies Affair, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:18, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Grievance Studies Affair

Hello, Rememberwhenrockwasyoung. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Grievance Studies Affair".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 10:00, 20 November 2019 (UTC)