User talk:RenzyBenzy
Welcome!
[edit]Hi RenzyBenzy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! — Lauritz Thomsen (talk) 01:44, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Thanks for the warm welcome. I appreciate it. But this occurred to me all of a sudden. How do I apply as an Admin? Or a rollbacker or a pending changes reviewer? I’d like to assume such roles so that I can contribute more to Wikipedia. Hope you can help me apply for those positions. Thanks a lot. Stay safe. RenzyBenzy (talk) 01:47, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
August 2020
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
RenzyBenzy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Why was I blocked? I was just asserting my right here. Was I involved in any disruptive editing/vandalism? I really believe I was not. Please unblock me. I am very much willing to expand the contents of different pages through my contributions and revisions. Give me another “chance” to make up for whatever things you think I have done wrong. Hoping for your kind consideration. Thank you. Stay safe. RenzyBenzy (talk) 10:03, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:26, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
RenzyBenzy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Yes, I already understand all policies and regulations here. I will do my best not to cause any damage or disruptions to any articles. I will make useful contributions too. Hoping for your kind consideration. Thanks. RenzyBenzy (talk) 01:08, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
These are just platitudes and do not answer the points described in the decline of your previous request. You need to demonstrate your understanding by explaining what you did wrong, why you won't do it again, and what constructive contributions you wish to make. 331dot (talk) 01:20, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello, I'm Samf4u. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:RenzyBenzy with this edit that didn't seem very civil, so I removed it. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it’s one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Samf4u (talk) 12:37, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Yes I understand that. It seems that these so-called admins are not even listening to my request and have been known to respond only if you’re correct in making this complaint. Care to process my unblocking request? I’ve had it with these incompetent, self-righteous people who aren’t even doing anything. RenzyBenzy (talk) 16:37, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Uhm? Hello? It’s not nice that these admins seem to turn a blind eye to your concern. What the fuck are they here for? Fucking irresponsible pricks. THEY’RE JUST ADMINS FOR THE NAME, NOT THE PURPOSE. TOTAL SLACKING IDIOTS. HELLO? ANY ADMIN WILLING TO HEAR MY UNBLOCKING CONCERN? ARE YOU THERE? COZ IF NOT, I’LL REPORT YOU TO PRESIDENT DUTERTE. HE’LL CLOSE THIS STUPID INFORMATION PLATFORM IF IT DOES NOT DO ITS FUCKING PURPOSE. SPECIAL MENTION TO THAT FUCKING ADMIN “GUERILLERO”. HI BRO, HOW’S IT DOING? HOW DOES YOUR IGNORANCE SUIT YOU? STILL TURNING A BLIND EYE TO MY CONCERN? HOPE YOU’LL CONTRACT COVID-19 IF IT WILL DO THE JOB, YOU SLACKING PRICK. RenzyBenzy (talk) 15:01, 20 August 2020 (UTC)