User talk:Rhiandorothybell

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Rhiandorothybell! Thank you for your contributions. I am Rubbish computer and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 10:17, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dan Willis (comedian)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dan Willis (comedian), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 10:18, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Adam Ethan Crow

Hello Rhiandorothybell,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Adam Ethan Crow for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Alpha3031 (t • c) 02:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've commented a couple places on this..

Haven't heard back yet, but I know things are busy and all..

I just built the page similar to other directors, but am happy to edit it down if that's needed..

Don't want to break the rules! Which is why I was careful to cite everything carefully.. Rhiandorothybell (talk) 06:09, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rhiandorothybell (Rhian? May I call you that?) The primary concern, and the one that lead to the speedy deletion of the article, is the tone of the phrases used. One of our most important core content policies, Neutral point of view, mainly requires us to represent viewpoints in proportion to their prominence in reliable sources. However, it also requires us to take an impartial, encyclopedic tone. Many works describing creative professionals, such as film directors or authors, can tend towards the effusive in their praise... or scathing, in criticism. This would not be generally considered appropriate in an encyclopedic work, and two of our speedy deletion criteria (G10 and G11) cover articles which take either tone. The most relevant subsection of that policy would be § Describing aesthetic opinions and reputations, for ease of reference.

You may also like to consult the linked guideline in the next subsection of that page, Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch. Or if you would prefer the short version, it would suffice to say phrases like "evolve into a prominent figure", "upbringing was anything but ordinary" and "collaborations with industry luminaries" are not generally considered acceptable unless they reflect a broad consensus across multiple of the most reliable sources (not just one or two, and not just sources normally considered acceptable for... a less extravagant turn of phrase).

Tone is just the first hurdle. Even though this is not literally your first article, the help page (Help:Your first article) may still be useful advice. A neutral tone would avoid immediate deletion, but one must ensure the sources you use demonstrate significant coverage in independent, reliable secondary sources. IMDb is not considered reliable, and interviews are not generally considered independent. The main sources used must be both, there must be enough independent analysis for an article to be written from just a few of those sources.

Please let me know if you have any other questions, and good luck. (You may also consider getting your articles reviewed by the draft review process, Wikipedia:Articles for creation and asking questions at the Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk — as drafts are, obviously, not finished, the standards are a little looser, though some will still be deleted if extremely promotional) Alpha3031 (t • c) 12:39, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problems, I shall be more neutral with anything in the future!

And draft things out of the Sandbox!!

-)

Thankyou for the feedback

Rhian Rhiandorothybell (talk) 07:53, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Rhiandorothybell/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:26, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rhiandorothybell! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:26, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]