User talk:Riaz Dean

AfC notification: Draft:Stone Tower has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Stone Tower. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:01, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stone Tower (September 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stone Tower and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:30, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Riaz Dean, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:30, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Stone Tower (Ptolemy) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Stone Tower (Ptolemy). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:03, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Stone Tower has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Stone Tower. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:04, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stone Tower (Ptolemy) has been accepted

Stone Tower (Ptolemy), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:57, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Stone Tower (Ptolemy)

A tag has been placed on Draft:Stone Tower (Ptolemy) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Another version of this draft was accepted into article space - Don't need this version

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:01, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Riaz Dean. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page William Lambton, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contribs)} 22:37, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi Liliana, My non fiction book has a whole chapter on William Langton and his work, which I was adding to ‘Further reading’. If that’s considered COI then I’ll not add it. Regards, Riaz 2407:7000:AA42:F600:51CE:13AE:798:9CE5 (talk) 00:11, 22 October 2022 (UTC)