User talk:Richardgrayson3451
May 2024[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 07:03, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Richardgrayson3451 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I apologise for my misbehavior and believe that perhaps there is a proper way to deal with this. I got my anger the best of me. Please forgive me and i will no longer edit Wikipedia pages without understanding the policies Richardgrayson3451 (talk) 08:04, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
An apology is a start, but to be unblocked you will need to demonstrate an understanding of relevant policies first- especially the fact that any interested person is welcome to contribute to an article or topic. 331dot (talk) 08:31, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Richardgrayson3451 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I understand those policies and have read them thoroughly. I understand that it is nessacary to accept other contributions and that to first make any change attempts in the talk page. i shall see that this shall be the procedure from next time and will remove all the messages i have put that have been against the Wikipedia editors
Decline reason:
I'm not convinced that you understand how Wikipedia works. OhNoitsJamie Talk 11:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Richardgrayson3451 (talk) 08:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Richardgrayson3451 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
A second chance to prove can help me make the better to contribute well for Wikipedia. if i fail then i will accept the block.
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:18, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Richardgrayson3451 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear Wikipedia Administrators,
I am writing to request the unblocking of my account. I understand that my recent edits went overboard and caused damage or disruption to Wikipedia. I deeply regret my actions and acknowledge that I did not fully consider the impact of my changes on the community and the integrity of the encyclopedia.
I have taken time to reflect on my actions and understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. I am committed to making constructive and useful contributions going forward. I assure you that I will not continue to cause any damage or disruption and will focus on editing in a way that benefits the Wikipedia community.
I kindly request you to consider lifting the block on my account. I am eager to return to contributing positively and responsibly.
Thank you for your understanding and consideration. Richardgrayson3451 (talk) 13:12, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Chatbot generated requests are not considered.(100% certain according to GPTzero). We want to hear from you, not an AI. Please write in your own words. 331dot (talk) 13:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
If you want to ever be able to post again, you are doing the exact wrong things. In five days, you've made *seven* unblock appeals, an absolutely absurd number, including three simultaneous ones when it's grossly improper to have more than one. And there's nothing new in any of them: you're basically saying you're sorry and you want another chance without much in the way of specifics. And, you also improperly removed a declined unblock request, meaning more time an editor had to spend because of a rule you violated.
If you actually want to return to editing Wikipedia, you need to change your approach completely. Remove your three open unblock requests and take the WP:OFFER, meaning you stay away from Wikipedia completely for six months (at a minimum). Administrators are volunteers and your unblock requests are not emergencies. You're far closer to having your talk page access removed, which makes it far less likely you'll ever be allowed to post again, than you are to being unblocked. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 19:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
TO Mr. talk Sir i understand that and if you think staying away from wikiepedia for "six" months is going to help me change i shall take it. But pls. understand that i only caused this problem because an inappropriate label was given to a hindu symbol and i wanted to remove it hastily. I have been editing for 6 months and this was the only problem sir. The only reason i sent 3 requests was because i thought i was being ignored so i removed a request hoping to gain attention to my pleas. Sir please understand that i had good intentions over here and that I'm not a bad person who causes Vandalism. I just acted hastily and wanted to hope to change things. I request for another chance in order to remove all forms of negative contents i put and will edit Wikipedia only to make it a better place for everyone to gain information. I will also first submit my proposed changes in the Talk page get consensus and only then move to proceed to edit. I will also first talk to the main editor before i make a huge edit. Pls. sir this is not a fake request where i act 2 faced and will resume to my ways of vandalising pages. This is genuine and i shall promise to be a better editor and if i don't you may remove my editing and block me and i will no longer ask for another chance. Also Mr.CoffeeCrumbs I will retract my wrong statements on Mrs Wendy Doniger,and will write a personal Apology to Mr.talk and to Mr. Joshua_Jonathan I will amend my ways from now on and will promise to no longer Violate Wikipedia rules. I have read them thoroughly. 13:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC)