User talk:Richly Awthentic

January 2022

Hi! I am not lying about my edits!

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Niggas in Paris—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 12:56, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Dexter Morgan. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Serols (talk) 12:56, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Jeff Lindsay (writer). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Serols (talk) 12:56, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:42, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Richly Awthentic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand my approach was not received well in regards to exposing what was stolen from me (I am a publisher & own a Publishing company,) but I assure you my written edits are valid and truthful. With that being said, I won't engage in that type of behavior on the platform again, but would like to know of a feasible venue to properly pursue my issue(s) at hand. 2600:1700:3200:59A0:D920:CFC9:2F0D:FE6B (talk) 14:47, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You'll need to find another venue to pursue your copyright claims; we can't help you here and it's disruptive to Wikipedia. that being said, what sort of other edits are you interested in making? --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:30, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:42, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Any further requests must come from your logged in account. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 17:04, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re: further decisions

well here's me requesting to be unblocked from my "talk" page inside of my "logged in" account on the grounds of adhereing to the guidelines and not posting any further disruptive content, ‪Jpgordon‬ & LuK3 .

You can log into your account and edit your talk page -- that's the one page you're allowed to edit when blocked. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 21:25, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

& how do you expect me to do that when you've blocked me & prevented me from logging in to my account?..

Any further requests must come from your logged in account. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 17:04, 3 January 2022 (UTC) 2600:1700:3200:59A0:A0C8:A18:CB47:5045 (talk) 17:25, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You can log into your account and edit your talk page -- that's the one page you're allowed to edit when blocked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 21:25, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:42, 3 January 2022 (UTC) Any further requests must come from your logged in account.