User talk:Rip21

Hello, Rip21! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:41, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Patrick Tucker-Pfieffer

The article Patrick Tucker-Pfieffer has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appeared to have no meaningful content or history, and the text was unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:41, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Patrick tucker-pfieffer

A tag has been placed on Patrick tucker-pfieffer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. George The Dragon (talk) 04:04, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Patrick tucker-pfieffer

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Patrick tucker-pfieffer, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 04:16, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NPA

I'm assuming you are also 68.49.0.188, correct? I have no idea what point you're trying to make, nor do I really care since I had nothing to do with it. From what I can figure out, you had an article on yourself deleted, and you're ticked off about it so you've decided to attack others. Don't do that, labeling edits as "Speedy delete your life" is a clear violation of the personal attacks rule. Redrocket (talk) 05:47, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kill yourself.--Rip21 (talk) 14:00, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In concurance with RR, yes, I would say you tried to make a page about yourself. Even if it was written badly, and basically nonsense, well, biographies on one's self are not allowed in wikipedia, as per its policies. An article on a person may only be included if that person was notable, a good example would be one of the old ministers of Canada, or a past president of the US, or someone that invented a new, and easier way of doing something that is very important. You get the idea, either way, the point being, the article you made on yourself did not assert the noblity of yourself, and would have been deleted anyway even if it was written well.— Dæ dαlus^{→quick link} / Improve 18:54, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify, the article was not about the editor. It was complete nonsense - things like how a can of soda and a grain of sand formed a baby (I may be way off on the details but it was nonsensical stuff like that). --NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 19:08, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 16:07, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]