User talk:Riyabakidkhar

Riyabakidkhar, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Riyabakidkhar! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Lorstaking (talk) 04:12, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Dkhar

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:44, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Content warring

The reason why I changed the content of the word Dkhar is because the current content is misleading. Although properly sourced, the content is biased and reflects a view of the bengalis which does not hold any actual meaning to the meaning of the word. I myself being a khasi find it an offence that outsiders who do not even know the full meaning of the word impart new meaning to it. I will not stand for this blatant bullying by faceless people which try to change the meaning of a word. I ask you this if DKHAR was offensive, then why do we use it in our lasnames case in point.l, kharkongor, Kharbhih, kharhujon and the list goes on. Before you block me for actually representing the word of my language, you should do some actual research on the word contact a professor of khasi from the khasi department of the North Eastern hill University. You owe an entire race an apology for changing the meaning of a word of a language you don't even speak. Riyabakidkhar (talk) 17:25, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Riyabakidkhar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The reason why I changed the content of the word Dkhar is because the current content is misleading. Although properly sourced, the content is biased and reflects a view of the bengalis which does not hold any actual meaning to the meaning of the word. I myself being a khasi find it an offence that outsiders who do not even know the full meaning of the word impart new meaning to it. I will not stand for this blatant bullying by faceless people which try to change the meaning of a word. I ask you this if DKHAR was offensive, then why do we use it in our lasnames case in point.l, kharkongor, Kharbhih, kharhujon and the list goes on. Before you block me for actually representing the word of my language, you should do some actual research on the word contact a professor of khasi from the khasi department of the North Eastern hill University. You owe an entire race an apology for changing the meaning of a word of a language you don't even speak.

Decline reason:

You deeply misunderstand Wikipedia. I encourage you to use the time while blocked to read and understand our policies, because if you continue like this, your next block will almost certainly be indefinite. You may wish to start with WP:NPOV and WP:VERIFY, and of course WP:EDITWAR which you've been violating. Yamla (talk) 18:32, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

WP:BATTLEGROUND would be pretty directly on point, too. --Yamla (talk) 18:32, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]