User talk:Rlandmann/archive16

Back?

Hey it is great to see you back! Hope you are able to keep your admin status! - Ahunt (talk) 01:14, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ahunt!!! It's been a good wake-up call and made me make decisions about how I want to stay involved with the project. Back to planes soon :) --Rlandmann (talk) 01:31, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Great, see you there! - Ahunt (talk) 01:51, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merger of Template:Infobox aircraft begin

Template:Infobox aircraft begin has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox aircraft. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 14:43, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Break down of demonic structures" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Break down of demonic structures has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 27 § Break down of demonic structures until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 16:06, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Soviet and Russian fighter aircraft has been nominated for splitting

Category:Soviet and Russian fighter aircraft has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NLeeuw (talk) 21:51, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Soviet and Russian patrol aircraft has been nominated for renaming

Category:Soviet and Russian patrol aircraft has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NLeeuw (talk) 22:14, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Soviet and Russian attack aircraft has been nominated for renaming

Category:Soviet and Russian attack aircraft has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NLeeuw (talk) 22:17, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Soviet and Russian military tanker aircraft has been nominated for renaming

Category:Soviet and Russian military tanker aircraft has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NLeeuw (talk) 22:21, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Soviet and Russian military utility aircraft has been nominated for renaming

Category:Soviet and Russian military utility aircraft has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NLeeuw (talk) 22:24, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Soviet and Russian agricultural aircraft has been nominated for renaming

Category:Soviet and Russian agricultural aircraft has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NLeeuw (talk) 22:28, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Soviet and Russian civil trainer aircraft has been nominated for renaming

Category:Soviet and Russian civil trainer aircraft has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NLeeuw (talk) 22:30, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Soviet and Russian ultralight aircraft has been nominated for renaming

Category:Soviet and Russian ultralight aircraft has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NLeeuw (talk) 22:32, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Roger Adam

The article Roger Adam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced for over a decade. Only found trivial mentions in online databases, does not seem to be notable enough to pass WP:NBIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 02:18, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Soviet attack aircraft

A tag has been placed on Category:Soviet attack aircraft indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:52, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Soviet and Russian military aircraft has been nominated for splitting

Category:Soviet and Russian military aircraft has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Michael Z. 03:03, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Soviet and Russian military aircraft

A tag has been placed on Category:Soviet and Russian military aircraft indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:12, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Hello, Rlandmann! We've known each other 20 years now, and I've always appreciated you. I am glad you are back. :) Neopeius (talk) 06:20, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Neopeius! I never get to stick around here as much as I'd like anymore, but this is much appreciated :) --Rlandmann (talk) 10:32, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of DFS 40

The article DFS 40 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wholly unreferenced since created 19.93 years ago, including the infobox fan-art.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 19:38, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]