Jump to content

User talk:Rob 50

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Rob69 69 69)


January 2024[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at West Asia, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Skitash (talk) 21:18, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Skitash. However, Greece is transcontinental so it should be included in the definition of West Asia. Rob69 69 69 (talk) 21:23, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please read WP:VERIFY. Skitash (talk) 22:07, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If I verify, can Greece be included? Rob69 69 69 (talk) 22:14, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at North Africa. Skitash (talk) 22:06, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why? The page literally says that Malta can be included in the description of North Africa, hence why I added it. I did not do anything wrong. Rob69 69 69 (talk) 22:12, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on West Asia[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page West Asia, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:40, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because your username is a clear violation of Wikipedia's username policy – it is obviously offensive, profane, violent, threatening, sexually explicit, disruptive, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to Wikipedia. Please see our blocking and username policies for more information.

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but users are not allowed to edit with accounts that have inappropriate usernames, and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, or would otherwise like to explain why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the following text to the bottom of your user talk page: {{unblock-un|new username|your reason here ~~~~}}

Daniel Case (talk) 19:12, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rob 50 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Rob 69 69 69

Decline reason:

This block has nothing to do with your edits; it's solely about your username. Pick a new one. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 23:11, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock discussion[edit]

Why have I been blocked? I literally did nothing wrong. I have been blocked unjustifiably. How is my username offensive? It is literally my name with 3 numbers at the end. I honestly think this was a personal attack on me just because I updated a page with factual knowledge and with a proper source. You could have just simply told me how to source properly instead of just blocking me for literally no reason. I am human and make mistakes just like all humans are prone to making. No one is perfect!!! You have no justification on why you blocked me as your reason made no sense! Rob69 69 69 (talk) 22:43, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll ask. Why did you use "69" in your username? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:27, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do you not know what it means? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:29, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No I don’t. Last time I checked, it is just a number. Rob69 69 69 (talk) 00:07, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But to include it three times in your username, it seems like it must be more than just a number to you. signed, Willondon (talk) 00:12, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I wanted to put it once but couldn’t. I then tried twice, I couldn’t. Only three times was allowed. Rob69 69 69 (talk) 00:20, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Let's just say it involves a physical position and evokes sometimes disturbing mental images. (That's why the filters stopped you from using it.) I'll be happy to rename you if you tell us a new username. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:59, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But to include even once seems like it must be more than just a number to you. signed, Willondon (talk) 02:26, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No. I just used that. No different than 68 or 70. Rob69 69 69 (talk) 03:37, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Meh, I must have been in my late teens or early twenties when I learned its provenance. So, anyway. Happy to rename you to something w/o that number. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:57, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Rob 50 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

can you change my username so that I can be unlocked. Change the numbers to 50.

Accept reason:

Renamed to Rob 50. Welcome back-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:18, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Inclusion of Greece in West Asia[edit]

Can we include Greece in the list of countries? I provided a link as proof that Greece is a transcontinental in both Europe and Asia. Rob69 69 69 (talk) 00:23, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 16:20, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]