User talk:Robinwhale
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cathy Christian, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.vampilore.co.uk/models/christian_cathy.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:56, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sascha Knopf, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://vampilore.co.uk/models/knopf_sascha.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:57, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Seeing your note on Coren's talk page, I have removed the tag and cleaned up the article. Please, for future reference, do not sign on articles. Thanks, —§unday His Grandiloquence 02:13, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
- As with Sascha Knopf. —§unday His Grandiloquence 02:15, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Copyright problem: Sascha Knopf
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Sascha Knopf, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://vampilore.co.uk/models/knopf_sascha.html, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Sascha Knopf and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Sascha Knopf with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Sascha Knopf.
It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Sascha Knopf/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Sascha Knopf saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:54, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
- Hi. I wanted to add a personal note in addition to this required "form letter" to explain that while your username (and your note to Coren) suggests that you may own the external site, since Wikipedia does not require identify verification on account creation, we must request that you follow one of the processes above to verify permission externally. As explained, you have the option of releasing the material into public domain or at GFDL at the website or of sending a note to the Wikimedia Foundation from an address associated with the original publication releasing the material accordingly.Please note that if you choose to release this material to Wikipedia, you will be granting our users rights to modify and reuse the material, commercially or otherwise, so long as your contribution is attributed.
- This step will also be necessary for the article Cathy Christian.
- If you have questions about this, please let me know at my talk page. Alternatively, you may find valuable feedback at Wikipedia's help desk, which is typically monitored around the clock by volunteers. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:58, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Copyright problem follow-up: Cathy Christian
[edit]Dear Robinwhale:
Since we do not yet have verification of permission by the processes set out above, the article has been deleted. This deletion is not necessarily permanent. If you have already sent a letter to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, the article will be restored when that letter is received and processed by the Communications Committee. Likewise, if you have not yet sent a letter, you may certainly do so at any point, and the article will be restored when that letter is received and processed. Thank you.--Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:05, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Maria DiAngelis
[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Maria DiAngelis, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jasynnash2 (talk) 15:32, 9 October 2008 (UTC)