User talk:Rodeosmurf

Welcome!

Hello, Rodeosmurf, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

I'm going to assume you're big into Swedish music, yes? DS 02:23, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zacharias Moussaoui

I hope you won't infer from this note that I'm a pedant (or grammar Nazi, notwithstanding that I concede the latter in a userbox) or impute malign motive to my writing, but I thought I ought to note that the grammatical revision you made to the Moussaoui article, even as it might have been syntactically appropriate, was grammatically inappropriate, in view of its improper conflation of which and a restrictive clause (even as such restriction might not be plain) and, more importantly, of its ascription to "which" of "a sentence", where the antecedent is undefined. The sentence was correct as written, toward which proposition I adduce, inter al., Merriam-Webster, scilicet, defintion three. I readily understand the reasons for which you made the change, though, and, in order that the sentence might be clearer, I'll interpolate a semicolon. Cordially, Joe 21:48, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ascot

Thank you for your constructive and interesting response. I feel British contributors need to be a bit careful about English placenames from which other names are derived. For example, I'm aware of tension over the relative importance of Windsor, Berkshire, a town (royal and historic but relatively small), and Windsor, Ontario a major city. I'm hoping that Canadian and Australian contributors will comment - I note there is also an Australian "Ascot racecourse". Here, the racecourse is what people have heard of, rather than the town, so maybe that belongs at the top. CarolGray 10:27, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Smurf1.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Smurf1.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:56, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help Prevent Article Deletion: Religious Perspectives on Dinosaurs

Hello, I'm leaving you this message because I notice you've made at least one significant edit to the Wikipedia article Religious perspectives on dinosaurs. The article has recently been nominated for deletion from Wikipedia, and there is considerable support for that position.

I'm hoping you'll help me support the continued existence of the Religious perspectives on dinosaurs article by registering a keep vote on the article's request for deletion page. The article contains some good information, and represents an unobtrusive way to present notable minority viewpoints about dinosaurs that cannot reasonably be elaborated on in the parent article. It shouldn't be deleted simply because the viewpoints it presents aren't "scientific."

Thanks! Killdevil 03:59, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:TheKnife promo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:TheKnife promo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 16:30, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:ResevoirDogs standoff.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:ResevoirDogs standoff.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 20:09, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GTA IV English

No need to apologise. It was just a discussion with contrasting sides and you hadn't seen a bit of info pertinent to your side of the argument. I can understand that it's irritating seeing words that are mis-spelt, but please remember, for each "instalment" that you've seen, European users have had to grit their teeth at a thousand words ending with -ize. - X201 09:34, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Smurf1.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Smurf1.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 1 != 2 03:15, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cubase screenshot.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cubase screenshot.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:26, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fall damage

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Fall damage, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 21:03, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Non-Free rationale for File:Smurf1.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Smurf1.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:14, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Smurf1.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Smurf1.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:45, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]