User talk:Rtk212

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Hello, Rtk212! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking Insert-signature.png if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Scientizzle 15:47, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. — Scientizzle 15:47, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Center for SCREEN-TIME Awareness[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Center for SCREEN-TIME Awareness has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources provided to establish notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Scientizzle 15:47, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of People's movement for human rights learning[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article People's movement for human rights learning has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-WP:Notable organization.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 21:11, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

What you should do...[edit]

I think by any reasonable understanding of WP:COI, you have a conflict of interest in the creation and editing of Center for SCREEN-TIME Awareness & People's movement for human rights learning. That doesn't prohibit you from contributing to these articles, but you should be aware of how your edits must conform to Wikipedia policies and guidelines on neutrality, verifiability, proper sourcing, and notability.

For both of these articles, it is not clear whether these organizations meet the general notability guideline for organizations. What you should provide is example of secondary coverage that discusses the subject in a non-trivial way. For example, news stories from major media outlets make great sources. If substantive third-party coverage cannot be demonstrated, it's very likely the articles will be deleted. You have several days before the proposed deletions expire, so don't panic and do your best. — Scientizzle 13:50, 5 November 2010 (UTC)