User talk:Rutherford 23

Recent edit to Jessa Duggar Seewald

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jessa Duggar Seewald, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 04:41, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alyssa Bates

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Alyssa Bates requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cahk (talk) 08:18, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Counting On, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 21:30, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You mean the fact I put factual information in there and you took it out Rutherford 23 (talk) 21:31, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I see you've been doing this for years, adding unverified material to BLPs. No more. Drmies (talk) 21:32, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

What exactly is “unverified” materials Rutherford 23 (talk) 21:33, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are you serious. You've been here for years and you don't know what "verified" means. I am not going to do that work for you: look it up. Also, you left a note on User talk:Familyupdater claiming this was your other account but you lost the password. That makes no sense since you had this account already in 2016, then edited with the other one in 2019, and then back to this one again. Either way, User:Familyupdater was a huge BLP violation and I deleted it. Please be more mindful of the rules of the website. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 21:37, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 23:19, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently editing contrary to the requirement for sourcing of information on living persons, continuing despite not only warnings, but even a short block. Almost all of us, when we start editing Wikipedia, know little or nothing about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, so nobody can be blamed for starting out doing things that are contrary to policies and guidelines that they don't know about. However, continuing to do the same things after being told about the relevant policies and guidelines is a different matter.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. JBW (talk) 21:42, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have now seen that, in addition to the warnings and block you have received on this account, you had been warned about the same thing on another account too. It is possible I might have made the block longer had I known that. JBW (talk) 20:33, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I haven’t edited anything in over 3 weeks. But okay 🤷🏻‍♀️ Rutherford 23 (talk) 23:47, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your last article edit was in fact two weeks and some hours before you posted that message. JBW (talk) 20:41, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was confirming something about Meghan and Harry’s actual wedding date, when was on May 16, 2019 not the public wedding on May 19, 2019. But lol ok Rutherford 23 (talk) 20:44, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Megan Fox. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges.

Hello! I reverted your edits on Megan Fox’s infobox because the partner parameter is for unmarried life partners only not dating. Please take a look at what each parameter should be in reference to here Template:Infobox Person. Thank you! LADY LOTUS • TALK 13:30, 13 October 2021 (UTC) LADY LOTUS • TALK 13:30, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eric Dane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Sloan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Rydel Lynch. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:04, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In the US names don't change on marriage unless the person involved explicitly chooses to do so. If you assert a name change you need a reliable source that directly states the name was changed and what it was changed to - there are a lot of options. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:07, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]