User talk:Ryan Amalfitano

January 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Wgullyn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Abu Ammaar Yasir Qadhi—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Wgullyn (talk) 02:01, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Abu Ammaar Yasir Qadhi. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mosrod^Talk 02:05, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Abu Ammaar Yasir Qadhi, you may be blocked from editing. Wgullyn (talk) 02:07, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Abu Ammaar Yasir Qadhi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Mosrod^Talk 02:08, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Abu Ammaar Yasir Qadhi. Yoshi24517 ^Chat _Online 02:13, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Abu Ammaar Yasir Qadhi have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Abu Ammaar Yasir Qadhi was changed by Ryan Amalfitano (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.855478 on 2022-05-22T18:13:06+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:13, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding material with a citation from a reliably published source.[edit]

Doug Weller talk 10:19, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. You do not appear familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. In particular, Wikipedia requires citations to reliable and authoritative third-party sources. Two good sets of Wikipedia guidelines that I have found really useful can be found HERE, regarding verifiability and HERE, regarding the need to maintain a neutral point of view. Best regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 13:45, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]