User talk:Ryulong/Archive 70

Archive 65

←

Archive 68

Archive 69

Archive 70

Archive 71

Archive 72

→

Archive 75

OOO's Great Power

Should I add in the Great Power of the Kamen Rider OOO Ranger Keys confirmed by Hyper Hobby April 2012 and Figure-Oh No. 169, or should I wait until the movie like usual. A new Astro Switch (Drill Switch Super-Three) and three cards (Reflecloud? and etc.) for the Goseigers were also confirmed in the magazine as well, however their names are not mentioned unlike the OOO stuff. ~Switch On 2012~ ( ★ AlienX2009 ★ ) 01:19, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Wait for the movie.—Ryulong (竜龙) 01:28, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Apologies

Ryulong I think I was, and I know I was, judging from other editor's comments, too over the top with the AfD. I felt that I wasn't exactly getting through to people when I was putting my two cents in - and that may/may not have been the case with you, but I think I could have taken a different approach to this. I should take this as something to learn from. Apologies for my actions, as they would be deemed as childish.

Hope to work with you sometime on the project - on perhaps something we'll both agree on. Regards, -- MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 07:12, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

could you please stop?

These inclusionist/deletionist wars have already been fought over 1000 million times. The authors are not SP or vanity, but heavily literary critiqued authors who sold millions of copies. I wish I could be more patient in this message to you, but the authorial criterion for works have been hammered out in 2005 for chrissakes and we cna't fight these battles over and over and over again. -WikiSkeptic (talk) 08:30, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

The articles are not sourced, and do not seem to say anything about the notability of the work itself. I do not see that these pass WP:GNG, even if the author is notable.—Ryulong (竜龙) 08:31, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Also, they do not appear to pass WP:BK.—Ryulong (竜龙) 08:33, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello! There was a WP BEFORE sourcing. Sourcing is NOVEL--- lack of sourcing requires a tag not a deletion review. Christ, I would have more patience but you newbies editors who weren't around when the site was fought over (the inclusionist/deletionist criteria were hammered out) turn contributing to this project a nightmare. -WikiSkeptic (talk) 08:36, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

I've been on Wikipedia for 6 years and I was an admin for nearly half of that. Don't tell me what I can and cannot do.—Ryulong (竜龙) 08:37, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

And sourcing is what the Wikipedia of the now requires. Don't blame me for the fact you can't keep up with the times.—Ryulong (竜龙) 08:39, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

I will study your contributions next week when I have more time, but what I have seen so far is 1000s of Ultraman and other fanboy plastic figurine collector expertise; at least have the courtesy to allow literary specialists their own unmolested section of interest. We don't go around deleting 'HATSUNE MIKU' vocaloid articles b/c we realize your subculture loves that stuff; give the old classicists their own five or six articles without jumping all over them at maximum velocity 'without the courtesy of an edit history review.' Christ. -WikiSkeptic (talk) 08:42, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Have fun going through my 157,684 edits, then. I frankly don't give a fuck about your edit history or the edit history of any of these pages that you've made. Many have never grown past your initial one to three unsourced paragraphs. Maybe if you didn't write shit articles, I wouldn't be proposing they be deleted. And my preferred topic areas should not be of any matter in this discussion. The fact is, you cannot write an article in line with the current rules and regulations of the project, which at least should be limited to adding god damn categories to the pages so they can be properly indexed.—Ryulong (竜龙) 08:45, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Ryulong, friend, you've previously been criticized for being too inclusionist. Today, I'm criticizing you for being too deletionist. A novel by Ryu Murakami is by definition notable. DS (talk) 11:52, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Is he a historic writer such that all his works are important?—Ryulong (竜龙) 19:08, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Yes; read our article about him. I concede that WikiSkeptic should have included more information, but "it is a novel by Ryu Murakami" is an assertion of notability. DS (talk) 15:07, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

I am not too sure.—Ryulong (竜龙) 17:46, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

AIV report

At Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism you reported 113.252.193.145, saying "Long term IP hopping vandal". Could you give some diffs, or at least some of the other IPs used? Searching through the editing history to try to find similar edits from other IPs could take ages, but if you already know about it you may be able to do it more easily. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:21, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

There have been many instances of the vandal showing up on pages with different IPs, all geolocating to Hong Kong, but I do not know where to find them at this time. He's a pain in the ass and needs to be blocked.—Ryulong (竜龙) 22:03, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

My Talk Page

Thank you User:Ryulong for contributing to my user page. I did realize you got rid of my categories on the bottom of my page. Those where things I contributed to and have interest in... I do thank you for the contribution, but would rather have my categories left alone. (RuMoR0922 (talk) 21:25, 15 March 2012 (UTC))

Those items do not belong on your user talk page. Those are categories for articles.—Ryulong (竜龙) 23:07, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Digimon Xros Wars (Last of Episode 79)

I checked on some website (Japanese) and another few find this;

"最終話 燃え上がれタギル！　栄光のデジモンハント！" on Last Episode 79 - http://anime.webnt.jp/programs/view/64 - Digimon Xros Wars Hunters. I think it's confirmed go to ending on March 25. Thank, Attawafn143 02:06, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

We'll find out then if it is truly over.—Ryulong (竜龙) 02:25, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Disruptive editing on HaMerotz LaMillion 2

Hi. There's a new disruptive editing on HaMerotz LaMillion 2 article by a new user account from Israel, writes a Hebrew alphabet. There is actually 13 legs and the source given to Tom/Adele's relationship from "Dating" to "Broke-Up" and it typed "Brock Up" and has been confirmed in Leg 12 was place in Singapore (filmed back in January). The "14 legs" was wrote by the same user and does not give article ownership. Could you revert this back to 13 legs? ApprenticeFan ^work 00:11, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

It's been fixed, and I've told him that Israel to Hungary was only one leg.—Ryulong (竜龙) 00:30, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Neuschwanstein Castle

On the TAR3 article Neuschwanstein Castle is listed as being in Fussen, but on TAR20 it is listed as being in Schwangau. Which one is it? Intoronto1125TalkContributions 04:02, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

The Neuschwanstein Castle page says Schwangau.—Ryulong (竜龙) 04:07, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Being Human (North America) plot summaries

If you are the one who has been updating the plot summaries of that show, first, thanks. Second, please try to reduce the length by 75%, they're much too long... compare the recent ones to Season 1... compare them even to the beginning of Season 2. Full plot summaries can be found on other sites. (BTW, I have been following the British version and not the North American version, so I truly appreciate that I can turn to Wikipedia to see what's up). Regards...Lapabc (talk) 20:20, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Well, we are supposed to cover the important bits of the plot here, which in my opinion is a watered down version of Syfy's summaries. I try to keep things short, but if we do not say what happens in some level of entirety, then what good are we as a resource?—Ryulong (竜龙) 20:29, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Reliable?

How is this source not reliable? -- MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 06:54, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Because I do not think the Humanisticher Pressedienst is an actual reputable German newspaper. online or otherwise.—Ryulong (竜龙) 06:56, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

I did not ask for your opinion, but rather solid evidence pointing to the newspaper being unreliable. This news outlet has been used in other Wikipedia articles just fine - but the second it reachers this article - "Uh-oh it's unreliable". -- MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 07:01, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

I don't care. It is not reliable for the English Wikipedia. It is used in a total of 4 other articles. And you are using it to just inflate the supposed notability by showing that some German user-oriented news aggregator has mentioned him in the past 24 hours.—Ryulong (竜龙) 07:03, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

That's absolutely ridiculous. You are removing it to inflate your own point that Shavershian is not an internet personality in the AfD. Your opinion on whether or not it is reliable - is flawed considering the fact that it is a news outlet. -- MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 07:05, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Just because it's a news outlet does not mean it can be trusted. It's a news site but that does not automatically make all news websites reliable sources.—Ryulong (竜龙) 07:06, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Point out and prove to me, where the source is unreliable. -- MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 07:07, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

It's a user-submitted news website. We have no idea on its editoral control. And this one article does not change everything. Also, I will be starting the 2nd AFD within the hour.—Ryulong (竜龙) 07:09, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Where does it state "user-submitted"? Oh, and will see you there soon. -- MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 07:11, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

I looked it up elsewhere.—Ryulong (竜龙) 07:12, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Where is this "elsewhere"? -- MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 07:13, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

German Wikipedia.—Ryulong (竜龙) 07:13, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

German Wikipedia? So all of a sudden, we're taking the word of German Wikipedia - over the word of a news outlet. This just gets more and more interesting, doesn't it? Could you please direct me to the relevant discussion so I can have a look? Thank you, -- MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 07:18, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

The German Wikipedia describes HPD in a way that makes me believe it is not a reliable source. And it is certainly not the first thing the English Wikipedia should use as a reliable source when discussing a subject that is not German or has nothing to do with Germany.—Ryulong (竜龙) 07:21, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Ryulong, I'm not stupid. If you show me where the German Wikipedia describes HPD - analize what it says - I might just happen to agree, and I'll revert my edit. But I can't do that If I don't see what German Wikipedia has to say about the source. Please link me to it, -- MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 07:41, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

de:Humanistischer Pressedienst.—Ryulong (竜龙) 07:45, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

That article is partially unsourced, therefore has misplaced opinions regarding the website. -- MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 08:30, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

The German Wikipedia does have different standards than the English one, but that should not be a reason why you should be able to use a German language website as a citation on the biography of an Australian citizen who has never done anything remotely related to Germany.—Ryulong (竜龙) 08:36, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Birth Prototype

I think Kamen Rider Birth Prototype desrves its own page. Its two different beings from Birth and it has been featured in two movies so far. ~Switch On 2012~ ( ★ AlienX2009 ★ ) 13:48, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

No it doesn't. It's just another version of Birth, like the 1986 and 2008 Ixas. It is functionally the same as standard Birth.—Ryulong (竜龙) 16:17, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Tsuchiya Hikaru

Thank you for reverting this user's mangling of interwiki links a month ago; he's just returned from a week-long block that I levied and immediately started up the same type of edits (largely emptying categories out of process, although he's also mangling more interwiki links) that got him blocked three times since December. His talk page is interesting reading. Nyttend (talk) 01:59, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

By the way, if you reply here, talkback please. Nyttend (talk) 01:59, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

TAR episode titles with locations

Hi. TAR14 was the first episode title that have a location name in per episode and it has been ever since (Ex. "Don't Let a Cheese Hit Me (Switzerland)" - First episode of TAR14; "I'm Like Ricky Bobby (Dubai)" - For TAR15 episode 5 - city rather than country) and was shown on CBS website three years ago. I added it back last year and proof that is right. ApprenticeFan ^work 01:26, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Okay. So long as it's in those older seasons.—Ryulong (竜龙) 02:00, 28 March 2012 (UTC)