User talk:SCIPagemaker

November 2023

Hello, I'm Annh07. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Collingwood Collegiate Institute have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Annh07 (talk) 04:44, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Collingwood Collegiate Institute. Bump this to final. No, creating a new account doesn't let you start over with the vandalism. You are either the same editor or working in coordination with them. Meters (talk) 04:49, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Stayner Collegiate Institute, you may be blocked from editing. Stop messing around. The declined draft comments explicitly say "If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted." and "Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted." Ignoring those comments by removing the feedback and immediately resubmitting the draft without addressing the concerns is not going to work.

As for the draft content, it appears you have simply copied material form somewhere else and made a few cosmetic changes without actually looking at it. How else do you explain claiming in one spot that the attendnace is as of November 2023 in one spot, but as of 2021-2022 in another, sourced to a reference that you supposedly accessed on 5 February 2022, and which does nto even mention attendance? Meters (talk) 05:08, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stayner Collegiate Institute (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails the requirements of WP:NSCHOOL, lacks any independent reliable secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stayner Collegiate Institute and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:57, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SCIPagemaker! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 04:57, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Stayner Collegiate Institute. Again, don't remove the declined draft notice or comments. Meters (talk) 03:27, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to write an article about this school, write it neutrally and provide independent sources. We do not need to see the school's PR-speak. And no, simply removing the bogus ref does not give you the right to remove the request for a citation on the attendance. Meters (talk) 03:40, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And stop adding sources thar do not support the claims. Meters (talk) 03:41, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Stayner Collegiate Institute

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Stayner Collegiate Institute, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Qcne (talk) 20:14, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]