User talk:SINGmeAsadSONG

Welcome!

Hi SINGmeAsadSONG! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 13:58, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 16:21, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing pattern is highly suspicious. Graham87 16:21, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I do not believe that I have been participating in disruptive editing. I haven't been using Wikipedia to push my own agenda. Most of my edits are changing images that should use vector graphs into ones that do. You can read about why this should be done here: Media for cleanup#PNG or JPEG images that should be SVG. Also here is a visual example of the difference between a raster image and vector graph. This is something that contributes to the progress in an article, as it is providing an improvement by replacing an inferior file with a superior one. The other majority of my edits are adding SVG files to articles, particularly signatures of the subject of the article. For example, ~~Katharine Hepburn's~~ Elizabeth Taylor's article doesn't includes a signature however similar actresses like Joan Crawford, Marlene Dietrich and Audrey Hepburn do have signatures on their pages. Isn't this something that other people would have wanted added to improve the article. Since it is included on other articles with similar subjects. The reason why I haven't been contributing much else to Wikipedia because I feel like I am more skilled in making vector graphs than writing. I don't feel comfortable making edits that don't have to do with the visual side of Wikipedia. I just wanted to focus on doing one thing and leave other aspects to editors with more expertize than me, maybe I overdid it a bit and I should start contributing in other ways instead.
If I have misinterpreted the reason for my block, please give me more information because I do want continue editing and I want to make sure that I am following Wikipedia's policy and rules.
SINGmeAsadSONG (talk) 05:18, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

SINGmeAsadSONG (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't want to come off as impatient, but I am wondering what is happening with the progress with my block. It's been a few days now and nothing has happened. I still think that my edits weren't disruptive and this block is unnecessary. But even if my review gets rejected, I wouldn't mind since I still would be getting a further explanation as to what I did wrong. I want to learn from my mistakes and become a better editor on Wikipedia. Hopefully this gets settled as soon as possible. Thanks. SINGmeAsadSONG (talk) 08:19, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Discussed with user and blocking administrator. User seems to understand issue and agrees to avoid the same issue in the future. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 22:05, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please be patient as I discuss this block with the blocking administrator. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 02:10, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have talked with the blocking admin. It seems the issue they had was with the addition of signatures to articles. Wikipedia:Signatures of living persons has information about Wikipedia's feelings about this. Basically there are several issues with using signatures of living people ranging from privacy to legality. It is also grey area in regard to copyright.

I don't think you intended to be disruptive and I think blocking you may have been an overreaction. After discussing with the administrator who blocked you they said that I could decide what to do.

I am happy to unblock you, however I just want to know that you are not going to be adding signatures to articles. In addition to all of the issues I mentioned above it is really not encyclopedic information. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 09:30, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

When you respond please include {{ping|HighInBC}} to get my attention. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 09:41, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@HighInBC: Okay, I see, after having a look at that article, I understand now how my edits could lead to several problems. I won't be adding signatures from now on. Thank you for your help. SINGmeAsadSONG (talk) 13:10, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@HighInBC: The ping wouldn't have gone through as SINGmeAsadSONG signed their message in a separate edit. D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 13:57, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you SINGmeAsadSONG and thank you Doggy54321. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 22:05, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Please refrain from making edits on Wikipedia pages such as those you made to Lucy Boynton, without first discussing your changes on the article's talk page, Your edit(s) require discussion to establish consensus as this is considered a type of change that other editors should be allowed to comment on. Your edits do not appear to have been discussed and have been reverted. Thank you. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 02:30, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Have Mercy (Chlöe song) (September 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft does not appear to indicate which of the musical notability criteria is satisfied. If at least one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page which criterion is met, and resubmit.

You may ask for advice about the musical notability criteria at the Teahouse.

If this song satisfies any of the musical notability criteria, please indicate, in an AFC comment or on the draft talk page, and resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Have Mercy (Chlöe song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Have Mercy (Chlöe song), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:53, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SINGmeAsadSONG! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:53, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jodie Comer infobox image

It seems the two Jodie Comer images are OK to use, per the Wikimedia Commons discussion I've copied to User talk:RCraig09#Jodie Comer infobox image. Good work, finding those images. Thanks. —RCraig09 (talk) 18:30, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Spider-Man Across the Spider-Verse (Part One) logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Spider-Man Across the Spider-Verse (Part One) logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of Succession episodes

Hello, SINGmeAsadSONG. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Succession episodes, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sabrina Carpenter

Hi, please don't use public articles to "experiment" with search engines. Especially when you're contravening consensus. Elizium23 (talk) 05:29, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Don't Worry Darling (teaser poster).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Don't Worry Darling (teaser poster).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]