User talk:Sajparker

Welcome!

Hello, Sajparker, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- WikHead (talk) 02:15, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Sally Barker. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- WikHead (talk) 02:15, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Sally Barker, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. -- WikHead (talk) 02:15, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons

Please familiarize yourself with the above policy and refrain from adding unsourced claims about other living people to articles. Thanks. --Michig (talk) 14:26, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We don't accept claims about people's personal lives without independent reliable sources to allow them to be verified. The policy linked above explains it. --Michig (talk) 15:56, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Sally Barker with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dusty777 21:14, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

this article is about me and I wish to remove it.

Two options. First of all you should note that Wikipedia is not censored. So it doesn't matter in general if some one individual wants the article gone. This could lead to politicians hushing up notable scandals for personal reasons, etc. There is also no proof that you are who you claim to be. So you could be a detractor of this singer and you wish to censor information about her. So the first option is to just let it go.

But assuming that you are her, there are options still available if you simply cannot stand to have this information abotu yourself known to the public. The best move would be to contact the Wikimedia Foundation and explain yourself to them. Several celebrities have successfully gotten information abotu themselves removed so I believe it is relatively painless. I'm sorry to make you jump through extra hoops if you really are the person in question, but I hope you can see why Wikipedia's policies require that we safeguard information on individuals unless there is earnest proof that they wish it removed. -Thibbs (talk) 21:21, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sally Barker with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dusty777 21:17, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Sally Barker with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Dusty777 21:18, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Sally Barker shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. One more revert and you will be blocked. Please don't let it go that far. Drmies (talk) 21:19, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dusty. I AM SALLY BARKER and I wish for the page to be removed. If I am not able to delete information about myself, please tell me how I should go about it.

I have temporarily locked the article. Please discuss the matter on the article talk page. Drmies (talk) 21:22, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sally w hat.jpg needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Sally w hat.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Sajparker}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:11, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sally w hat.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Sally w hat.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 10:50, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]