User talk:SamsungFuqua

Fair use rationale for File:China Campus.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:China Campus.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 00:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:China_Campus.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:China_Campus.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. PhilKnight (talk) 00:09, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, SamsungFuqua. You have new messages at Tnxman307's talk page.
Message added 16:01, 25 April 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hello. I just left a note on the talk page of the IP you've been using to edit User talk:Tnxman307. Next time you'd like to restore your comments from an archive please log in to your account first of all or it will look like IP vandalism. Regards, De728631 (talk) 15:32, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fuqua School of Business

I've reverted your addition to this article. As we've discussed before, you must cite independent reliable sources when adding material. A plain link to the research center's page does not suffice. TN X Man 13:18, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox Restored

Hi. I restored the infobox to the Fuqua page. Infoboxes are designed to concisely present information about subjects without cluttering up the editing screen (see your edit here, which added 2k worth of a characters to display the same information the box did previously). If you have questions, please let me know. TN X Man 13:48, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest warning

Hello, SamsungFuqua. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID). Thank you. ElKevbo (talk) 22:16, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a relationship with Fuqua School of Business‎? ElKevbo (talk) 03:26, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reaching out. I have no relationship with the Fuqua School of Business, simply an interest (uncompensated) in academia. Also note, I have no relationship with Samsung, just happens to be the TV I own. Sorry there isn't more of a backstory to my username. SamsungFuqua

If you have an interest in "academia," is there any particular reason why (a) your username includes "Fuqua" and (b) you only edit that one specific article? ElKevbo (talk) 05:18, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fuqua happens to be a family name (unrelated to the school) and Samsung happens to be the TV that I own. I have not made changes to the pages of other business schools because, as you alluded to and as has played out here, my username gets misassociated with the Fuqua School of Business so any other edits would end up leading to unnecessary "edit wars". I have been cursed with a name that intersects with the name of a school which limits my ability to edit (think about what the reaction would be if someone who is coincidentally named "Mr. Harvard" were to edit the Wikipedia pages for Yale University, Princeton University, or any other ivy league school for that matter). I would, however, consider changing my username if that would help anything at all. I would also mention that the Internet is a very small window for judgement and my interest in academia extends beyond Wikipedia and my username, meaning that I apply my academic interests more broadly to other schools through other efforts offline. Regarding edits, to be fair, I could ask you the same question. Why have you not removed "unnecessarily detailed" information from the intro paragraphs or other sections of any other top business school to a similar caliber to your edits here? You can see how quickly one can form a judgement over 'perceived' associations or 'perceived' biases towards one academic institution or another which are probably not as they seem. SamsungFuqua

Disambiguation link notification for March 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fuqua School of Business, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages BCG and Amazon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:SamsungFuqua, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=SamsungFuqua|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 11:42, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]